2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2020.05.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction in length of stay of patients admitted to a regional burn centre during COVID-19 pandemic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
11
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, however, relatively higher %TBSA of full-thickness burns, PBI, and in-hospital mortality were all identified during the stay-at-home order in this study. While the severity of injury under the stay-at-home order/lockdown was conflicting in past studies [9] , [11] , [12] , [19] , [24] , [29] , an increased burn area was frequently observed, particularly in the pediatric population [9] , [11] , [19] . Considering that these results were not statistically significant, further studies are needed to validate the association between stay-at-home orders and the severity of burn injuries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, however, relatively higher %TBSA of full-thickness burns, PBI, and in-hospital mortality were all identified during the stay-at-home order in this study. While the severity of injury under the stay-at-home order/lockdown was conflicting in past studies [9] , [11] , [12] , [19] , [24] , [29] , an increased burn area was frequently observed, particularly in the pediatric population [9] , [11] , [19] . Considering that these results were not statistically significant, further studies are needed to validate the association between stay-at-home orders and the severity of burn injuries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Regarding the severity and outcomes of burn injuries, patients during the pandemic had shorter LOS and lower in-hospital mortality, whereas the difference in severity of burn injury was trivial. As suggested in a previous study, the LOS would have been shortened to avoid the risk of COVID-19 infection during the hospital stay [29] , or simply due to historical improvements in health care. Furthermore, a certain proportion of patients, such as those with severe burn injuries, is expected to remain constant during the pandemic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, there was a decreased length of stay for burns less than 20% TBSA, consistent with findings from other studies. 22 A potential explanation for this may be an increased clinical and administrative emphasis on timely, medically appropriate patient discharges to limit patient hospital exposure and expand bed capacity for surge planning. These unprecedented hospital surges and limited bed capacity brought to the forefront the role of adequate social services support and ancillary support to facilitate effective discharges.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Views regarding reduction in mortality and improved recovery outcome were not uniform, as few respondents also reported worsened recovery outcome. Other published work also reported shorter duration of stay for burn patients during the pandemic resulting in post-discharge complications [23] . Reorganisation of health facilities due to COVID-19 protocols led to the prolonged care-seeking pathway for admission to burn ward or ICU.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%