1991
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(91)90325-f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction in medical care cost associated with radiofrequency catheter ablation of accessory pathways

Abstract: The cost of definitive therapy was compared in 25 patients who underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation of accessory pathways in 1990 and 25 patients who underwent surgical ablation of accessory pathways in 1989. In the radiofrequency group, 23 of 25 patients had a single accessory pathway and the remaining 2 patients each had 2 accessory pathways. In the surgical group, 20 patients had a single accessory pathway and 5 patients each had 2 accessory pathways. The success rate was 96% in each group. The mean d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

1994
1994
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of the economic studies on AF have been conducted in the United States with a hospital or third-party payer perspective using decision modeling to estimate the costs of specific treatments. These studies focused specifically on costs associated with either interventional procedures [3][4][5][6], anticoagulation and stroke prevention [7][8][9][10][11][12][13], or pharmacological treatments [3,[7][8][9][10]12,[14][15][16][17]. Studies examining the "national" cost of AF have been conducted in the UK [18] and France [12], however, the overall cost of treating AF in various healthcare settings has not been examined in the United States.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of the economic studies on AF have been conducted in the United States with a hospital or third-party payer perspective using decision modeling to estimate the costs of specific treatments. These studies focused specifically on costs associated with either interventional procedures [3][4][5][6], anticoagulation and stroke prevention [7][8][9][10][11][12][13], or pharmacological treatments [3,[7][8][9][10]12,[14][15][16][17]. Studies examining the "national" cost of AF have been conducted in the UK [18] and France [12], however, the overall cost of treating AF in various healthcare settings has not been examined in the United States.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also more cost-effective than surgery. 27 Pathways on either side of the heart can be ablated with comparable efficacy and procedures are usually completed within a couple of hours. Multiple pathways can be detected and ablated in sequence during a single session.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one US study, the cost of surgery in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome was estimated to be $53 000, compared with $15 000 for catheter ablation 19. Another study, which compared the cost of medical management before catheter ablation with the cost of the procedure in patients with AVNRT, found total costs of $7600 and $16 000, respectively 20.…”
Section: Economic Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%