Reduction in medication errors in hospitals due to adoption of computerized provider order entry systems

Abstract

ObjectiveMedication errors in hospitals are common, expensive, and sometimes harmful to patients. This study's objective was to derive a nationally representative estimate of medication error reduction in hospitals attributable to electronic prescribing through computerized provider order entry (CPOE) systems.Materials and methodsWe conducted a systematic literature review and applied random-effects meta-analytic techniques to derive a summary estimate of the effect of CPOE on medication errors. This pooled estimate was combined with data from the 2006 American Society of Health-System Pharmacists Annual Survey, the 2007 American Hospital Association Annual Survey, and the latter's 2008 Electronic Health Record Adoption Database supplement to estimate the percentage and absolute reduction in medication errors attributable to CPOE.ResultsProcessing a prescription drug order through a CPOE system decreases the likelihood of error on that order by 48% (95% CI 41% to 55%). Given this effect size, and the degree of CPOE adoption and use in hospitals in 2008, we estimate a 12.5% reduction in medication errors, or ∼17.4 million medication errors averted in the USA in 1 year.DiscussionOur findings suggest that CPOE can substantially reduce the frequency of medication errors in inpatient acute-care settings; however, it is unclear whether this translates into reduced harm for patients.ConclusionsDespite CPOE systems’ effectiveness at preventing medication errors, adoption and use in US hospitals remain modest. Current policies to increase CPOE adoption and use will likely prevent millions of additional medication errors each year. Further research is needed to better characterize links to patient harm.

The Impact of Rudeness on Medical Team Performance: A Randomized Trial

“…4,34 Overall, we found rudeness explained 52% of the variance in diagnostic performance and 43% of the variance in procedural performance. In comparison, recent meta-analyses found that structural factors such as the presence/absence of computerized order entry systems explained just 12.5% of the variance in medication error 38 and chronic sleep loss explained just 23% of the variance in physician clinical performance. 39 We concluded from these findings that greater attention should be paid to dayto-day social interaction as a critical risk factor for iatrogenesis, and that in taking steps to enhance patient safety, policy makers should begin to consider the role played by the subtle and seemingly benign verbal aggression to which medical professionals are subjected on a routine basis.…”

Prioritizing Paperwork Over Patient Care: Why Can't We Do Both?

“…It is nearly impossible, even for pharmacists with advanced training, to maintain a sufficient degree of competency to prevent adverse events through drug interactions. The availability of electronic user interfaces during dynamic data documentation combats this weakness in health care and allows for automation of alert messages in order to reduce medication error, 22,33 as well as errors with order entry in general. However, with the rising number of alert messages during the dynamic electronic documentation process, we run the risk of ''alert fatigue'' among care providers.…”

“…Only 2 of the major objectives of the documentation process are reviewed here as examples: (1) the improvement of interprovider communication, and (2) the prevention of medical error. These objectives were selected because they are 2 of the most commonly cited goals for medical data capture, [21][22][23] and they also are high-priority targets for quality improvement, since the outcomes achieved can be quantitatively measured.…”

Medications and the Culture of Safety

“…An example of improved medication safety has been the use of computer order entry that removed medication abbreviations for physician orders. This has decreased many medication mix-ups that had resulted from commonly used medication abbreviations [6]. However, it is worth noting that in complex systems, a new technology that helps reduce errors in one domain may cause new types of errors in other domains.…”