1975
DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1975.tb07612.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction in the Cholinesterase Activity of the Rat Anococcygeus Muscle Produced by Corticosterone

Abstract: 1 Administration of corticosterone caused a 47% reduction in the cholinesterase (ChE) activity of homogenates of the rat anococcygeus muscle. 2 ChE activity was also reduced by morphine withdrawal and this effect was abolished by the corticosteroid synthesis inhibitor, metyrapone. 3 A single dose of reserpine reduced ChE activity in normal but not in adrenalectomized rats. 4 ChE activity was increased by adrenalectomy or by metyrapone treatment. 5 The mechanism of the corticosteroid-induced reduction in ChE ac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although histochemical techniques have failed to demonstrate butyryl or acetylcholinesterase in the rat anococcygeus (Gillespie, 1972;Bumstock et al, 1978), cholinesterase activity has been demonstrated colorimetrically (Gibson & Pollock, 1975;Smith & Spriggs, 1979) and the ability of neostigmine to potentiate responses to acetylcholine (but not to carbachol) confirmed (Gillespie & McGrath, 1974). The present study demonstrates that the potentiating effects of neostigmine were limited to the contractile responses to cholinomimetics and appeared to be correlated with a susceptibility to cholinesterase, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although histochemical techniques have failed to demonstrate butyryl or acetylcholinesterase in the rat anococcygeus (Gillespie, 1972;Bumstock et al, 1978), cholinesterase activity has been demonstrated colorimetrically (Gibson & Pollock, 1975;Smith & Spriggs, 1979) and the ability of neostigmine to potentiate responses to acetylcholine (but not to carbachol) confirmed (Gillespie & McGrath, 1974). The present study demonstrates that the potentiating effects of neostigmine were limited to the contractile responses to cholinomimetics and appeared to be correlated with a susceptibility to cholinesterase, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Cholinesterase activity has also been detected in the tissue (Gibson & Pollock, 1975;Smith & Spriggs, 1979). However, although Gillespie's original paper (1972) demonstrated atropinesensitive, acetylcholine-induced contractions and a subsequent study (Gillespie & McGrath, 1974) illustrated the ability of neostigmine to potentiate responses to acetylcholine, no further detailed studies on the muscarinic antagonist/agonist interaction have been undertaken.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors reported a reduction in AChE activity after stress [22][23][24]44]. Similar effect was observed in striate muscles of animals treated with CORT [26,45] or dexamethasone, a syntetic glucocorticoid [27]. These observations suggest that an excess of glucocorticoids might downregulate, directly or indirectly, the ChE activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…No changes were observed in adrenalectomized animals [18,20,25]. Treatment with CORT also results in changes in AChE activity [20,26,27], which suggests that the changes observed in stressed animals IJOMEH 2013;26(4) 638 before the CVP injection and was repeated during the following four days at approximately the same hour (between 8:00 and 9:00 a.m.). The CVP doses were selected on the basis of data from our earlier studies on the same compound [14].…”
Section: Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former change appears to result from the steroid-induced reduction in muscle cholinesterase activity (Gibson & Pollock, 1975b), thus explaining the specific increase in sensitivity to ACh. However, the second effect, on muscle contractility is as yet unexplained, and in this paper a possible explanation is presented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%