2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2015.06.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction kinetics of aqueous U(VI) in acidic chloride brines to uraninite by methane, hydrogen or C-graphite under hydrothermal conditions: Implications for the genesis of unconformity-related uranium ore deposits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Oxygen gas was removed from the vessels according to the reaction (Dargent et al. ):normalO2false(normalgfalse)+normalN2normalH2false(aqfalse)=2normalH2Ofalse(aqfalse)+normalN2false(normalgfalse).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Oxygen gas was removed from the vessels according to the reaction (Dargent et al. ):normalO2false(normalgfalse)+normalN2normalH2false(aqfalse)=2normalH2Ofalse(aqfalse)+normalN2false(normalgfalse).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To remove oxygen trapped in the porosity of the Teflon Ò bowls, the bowls were pretreated with a hydrazine solution (20 ppm N 2 H 2 ) at 200°C for 1 day. Oxygen gas was removed from the vessels according to the reaction (Dargent et al 2015):…”
Section: Hydrothermal Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presumably, the Mackenzie event provided both the material, in the form of Ni-As rich magmas, and potentially the energy needed for hydrothermal activity to transport the metals to the Athabasca Basin, where they are redeposited in the form of arsenides, sulfides and sulfarsenides in the uranium deposits. In this context Ni-Co-As mineral precipitation seems to be dependent on structural controls and reducing environments, likely resulting from hydrogen produced by the radiolysis of water, similar to those that drove earlier U reduction and deposition (Dargent et al, 2015;Truche et al, 2018) because there are no occurrences of Ni-Co-As independent from U deposits in the Athabasca Basin. The Mackenzie event thus deeply modified the initial characteristics of the unconformity-related U deposits, being likely responsible for remobilisation of the primary stage 1 uranium oxides in the deposit, with partial to total resetting of the U-Pb uraninite age and formation of stage 2 uranium oxides (as well as the U oxides found within the WC530 rammelsbergite vein), and for massive deposition of nickel, cobalt, sulfur and arsenic in the form of arsenides, sulphides and sulfarsenides.…”
Section: Contribution Of Rammelsbergitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a model could explain why uranium was precipitated within the sandstones of the basin sequences, which generally lack phases capable of buffering oxidation state. Dargent et al [140] proposed that the reductant could have been hydrogen gas rather than methane. Pascal et al [66] demonstrated that the destruction of graphite and sulphides could generate enough methane (and H 2 S) to cause significant uranium deposition.…”
Section: Metal and Ligand Transport And Depositionmentioning
confidence: 99%