2007
DOI: 10.2174/157016207780077057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction of Anti-HIV-1 Gag Immune Responses During Co-Immunization: Immune Interference by the HIV-1 Envelope

Abstract: Immunization with more than one immunogen (co-immunization) is an efficient regimen to induce immunity to multiple antigens. However, immune interference has been reported using multi-plasmid DNA immunizations. HIV-1 envelope (Env) and Gag gene products are the predominant immunogens used in current AIDS vaccines, although, few studies have evaluated possible immune interference when these two antigens are co-administered. Therefore, in this study, immune interference during co-inoculation was examined using D… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
17
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
3
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the mean value of Gag specific CD4C and CD8C T cells decreased after immunization of rLaSota/gp160 together with rLaSota/optGag compared to immunization with rLaSota/opt Gag alone. The gp160 mediated suppression of CD4C and CD8C T cell responses against Gag could be due to various reasons as reported in various findings reported previously (1) competition of expression resulting in immunodominance of Env over Gag; 36 (2) suppression of expression via type1 IFN; 37 (3) Env-mediated suppression of dendritic cell activation and maturation; 38 and (4) epitope competition for H-2 d MHC class I presentation especially in case of CD8C T cell suppression. 39,40 Further, inclusion of rLasota/optGag with rLaSota/gp160, rLaSota/gp140L and rLaSota/gp140S enhanced Env-specific IFN-g-producing CD4C and CD8C T cells compared to the Env expressing rNDVs inoculated alone in our previous study.…”
Section: Increase Cd4mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…However, the mean value of Gag specific CD4C and CD8C T cells decreased after immunization of rLaSota/gp160 together with rLaSota/optGag compared to immunization with rLaSota/opt Gag alone. The gp160 mediated suppression of CD4C and CD8C T cell responses against Gag could be due to various reasons as reported in various findings reported previously (1) competition of expression resulting in immunodominance of Env over Gag; 36 (2) suppression of expression via type1 IFN; 37 (3) Env-mediated suppression of dendritic cell activation and maturation; 38 and (4) epitope competition for H-2 d MHC class I presentation especially in case of CD8C T cell suppression. 39,40 Further, inclusion of rLasota/optGag with rLaSota/gp160, rLaSota/gp140L and rLaSota/gp140S enhanced Env-specific IFN-g-producing CD4C and CD8C T cells compared to the Env expressing rNDVs inoculated alone in our previous study.…”
Section: Increase Cd4mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…2,32 We believe the present data are not definitive on this issue, because the formation of the gp120-GRFT complex may eliminate at least some of the possible immunosuppressive effects of gp120, notably those mediated by its mannose moieties. Differently designed studies would be required to answer this point.…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…A recent study by Toapanta et al reported that HIV-1 gp120 interferes with HIV-1 Gag immunogenicity in plasmidimmunized mice. However, this effect of gp120 was observed only with HIV-1 Gag and not with other antigens, and no correlation was found with the level of antigen expression (27). We believe that this inconsistency could be related to the different analysis tools and methods used to track antigen expression and quantify immune responses in the respective studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…More importantly, there is evidence that vaccination with gp120 can enhance viral replication and even decrease protection provided by other antigens (4,25). In a recent study the HIV envelope was reported to reduce the immune responses elicited against the HIV gag antigen by an unknown mechanism (27).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%