“…[40] AD SSC with aT iO 2 -C 3 N 4 (ST) photoanode displayed ah igh PCE of 5.17 %, which was 2.0 and 6.5 times higher than the PCEs obtained by DSSCs with TiO 2 -C 3 N 4 (PS) and TiO 2 -C 3 N 4 (PM), respectively.T he high photovoltaic activity of the TiO 2 -C 3 N 4 (ST) photoanode is superior or comparable to most reported state-of-the-arth ighly active photoanodes ( Ta ble 2). [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52] Only multichannel ZnO nanowirea rrays displayed ah igher photovoltaic activity than our TiO 2 -C 3 N 4 (ST) microspheres;h owever,t hesea rrays suffered from complex preparation procedures. [49] Additionally,t he DSSC with aT iO 2 -C 3 N 4 (ST) photoanodeh ad ah igher PCE than those of DSSCs with P25-TiO 2 and TiO 2 microspheres as photoanodes, partially attributable to the enhanced dye adsorption resulting from the larger specific surface area and microspherical morphology.B ased on the UV/Vis spectra of the absorbed N719 dye on different photoanodes ( Figure S7), the amounts of the absorbed dye on the P25-TiO 2 , TiO 2 microspheres, TiO 2 -C 3 N 4 (ST) photoanodesw ere1 .00 10 À7 ,1 .33 10 À7 ,a nd 1.79 10 À7 mol cm À2 ,r espectively.T he amount of the absorbed N719 dye on TiO 2 microspheres was comparable to that of reported TiO 2 microspheres, [53] suggesting ar eliable comparison of dye adsorption capability in this study.T he enhanced N719 dye adsorption capability of TiO 2 -C 3 N 4 (ST) contributed somewhat to the higher PCE of the DSSCs with aT iO 2 -C 3 N 4 (ST) photoanode.…”