2004
DOI: 10.1080/13923730.2004.9636296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction of external rail wearing on road curves

Abstract: Railway line curves restrict train speed. Besides, there is a high side wearing intensity in the external rail head on the curves. The main functions of cant are discussed in the article. Results of experimental research which was carried out in order to estimate the influence of cant and gauge increase on the curves of rail head side wearing intensity, are presented. Improved cant calculation methodology, which assures rail head side wearing intensity reduction and safe railway traffic, is suggested.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Povilaitiene and Podagelis 6 described the factors that influenced rail side wear, divided the factors into three groups (uncontrolled factors, partially controlled factors, and controlled factors), and used the regression analysis to analyze the effects of those factors on rail side wear. They proposed a rail cant calculation methodology (see Povilaitiene and Laurinavicius 7 ) and a mathematical model (see Povilaitiene et al. 8 ) to evaluate the influence of the rail cant and gauge width on the rail wear around curves; in their experiments, they observed that an increase in the cant and a widening of the gauge around a curve with a radius of less than 650 m decreased the intensity of the external rail head side wear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Povilaitiene and Podagelis 6 described the factors that influenced rail side wear, divided the factors into three groups (uncontrolled factors, partially controlled factors, and controlled factors), and used the regression analysis to analyze the effects of those factors on rail side wear. They proposed a rail cant calculation methodology (see Povilaitiene and Laurinavicius 7 ) and a mathematical model (see Povilaitiene et al. 8 ) to evaluate the influence of the rail cant and gauge width on the rail wear around curves; in their experiments, they observed that an increase in the cant and a widening of the gauge around a curve with a radius of less than 650 m decreased the intensity of the external rail head side wear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, superelevation calculation method, which takes into consideration not only the permissible uncompensated acceleration for passenger trains (0.7 m/s 2 ), but also setting up the permissible uncompensated acceleration for freight trains (±0.3 m/s 2 ) (Povilaitienė, Laurinavičius 2004), which is included in formulae 11and 12, ensures that the superelevation calculated according to this method will secure the lowest uncompensated lateral acceleration.…”
Section: Analysis and Evaluation Of Modelling Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we analyse the applied methodology for calculation of the superelevation and seek to identify its shortcomings. We also employ our earlier published research results (Gailienė 2012;Povilaitienė, Laurinavičius 2004;Povilaitienė 2004) to make recommendations for improvement of the methodology for calculation of the superelevation. This way we seek to make the railway traffic safer and more comfortable and to ensure the least possible wear of the rail.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sometimes, already knowing the factors that have been determined by many researches and have a negative impact on rail wear in the curves and traffic safety (derailment probability), new researches are carried out to choose one or several geometric parameters such as the research object and to evaluate their design and supervision peculiarities (Wolf 2006;Klauser 2005). Research on the intensive formation of external rail side wear in the curve points to the following factors: uncontrolled (railway line plan and profile), partially controlled (train weight, axial loads) and controlled (train speed, rail and wheel steel toughness, wheel and rail lubrication, superelevation, gauge) (Povilaitienė, Laurinavičius 2004). Researches remain topical and necessary, because expenses concerning the maintenance of track geometry are high in all countries (Bouch et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%