2013
DOI: 10.1002/ep.11758
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction of [Fe(III)EDTA] catalyzed by activated carbon modified with ammonia solution

Abstract: NO and SO2 can be removed simultaneously by [Fe(II)EDTA]2− solution. Activated carbon is used to catalyze the regeneration of [Fe(II)EDTA]2− to maintain the NO removal efficiency at a high level for a long time. In this article, ammonia solution has been tried to modify the coconut activated carbon to ameliorate its catalytic capability in the regeneration of [Fe(II)EDTA]2−. Experiments have been made in a batch stirred cell to investigate the effects of modification conditions, such as ammonia concentration, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen from the Figures 3-5 that the reaction order of NO was 1.5, 1.8, 0.2 in the quick-reaction zone, transition zone and slow-reaction zone, respectively. The proposed mechanism could be that in the dual oxidant (H 2 may almost translate into OH• by OH -, OH• was the dominant active radical at the inflexion point. In the slow-reaction zone, the quenching reactions of these free radicals in the dual oxidant (H 2 O 2 /S 2 O 22 8 ) system may become significant, leading to a decrease in NO reaction rate.…”
Section: No Reaction Ordermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can be seen from the Figures 3-5 that the reaction order of NO was 1.5, 1.8, 0.2 in the quick-reaction zone, transition zone and slow-reaction zone, respectively. The proposed mechanism could be that in the dual oxidant (H 2 may almost translate into OH• by OH -, OH• was the dominant active radical at the inflexion point. In the slow-reaction zone, the quenching reactions of these free radicals in the dual oxidant (H 2 O 2 /S 2 O 22 8 ) system may become significant, leading to a decrease in NO reaction rate.…”
Section: No Reaction Ordermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nitrogen oxides and sulfur oxides emitted from coal‐fired power plants, not only can cause a series of air pollution problems such as acid rain and photochemical smog, but also are the main precursors of haze weather . At present, in the countries of China, the United States and Japan, the wet flue gas desulfurization and selective catalytic reduction combination technology (WFGD‐SCR) has been widely applied in the coal‐fired power plants to achieve the simultaneously desulfurization and denitration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9−12 Alternatively, heterogeneous catalytic reduction has received increasing attention because of the superiority of high catalytic efficiency, few by-products, and recyclable ability. For example, Long et al 13,14 modified the activated carbon as the catalyst and used sulfite as the reducing agent to reduce Fe(III)EDTA. Xiang et al 15 applied selenium as the catalyst to reduce Fe(III)EDTA with the aid of sulfite.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the biological process has been reported to simultaneously reduce Fe­(II)­EDTA-NO and Fe­(III)­EDTA; nonetheless, the minor regeneration rate, complete equipment, and the long period required for complicated isolation and culture of bacteria bring about high operating costs. Similarly, the easy oxidation nature of these reductive metals when exposed in air and unrecyclable properties after usage result in high material costs. Alternatively, heterogeneous catalytic reduction has received increasing attention because of the superiority of high catalytic efficiency, few by-products, and recyclable ability. For example, Long et al , modified the activated carbon as the catalyst and used sulfite as the reducing agent to reduce Fe­(III)­EDTA. Xiang et al applied selenium as the catalyst to reduce Fe­(III)­EDTA with the aid of sulfite.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some agents such as the dithionite ion (S 2 O 4 2– ), hydrazine (N 2 H 4 ), polyphenolic compound, and a chemical absorption–biological reduction (BioDENO x ) were found to be efficient reducing agents of the ferric ion in [Fe III (edta)­(H 2 O] − at ambient temperature. Activated carbon also acts as an effective reduction agent in this system. At present, only the sulfite ion has been widely examined as a reducing agent to the ferrous ion in this system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%