2012 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2012.6288079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction of ghost effect in exposure fusion by detecting the ghost pixels in saturated and non-saturated regions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the previous section, we have seen that each of the steps provides a less noisy and/or more plausible ghost map than the hard thresholding methods [26,29]. In this section, we compare the accuracy of the overall ghost map g = g w ∪ g l with those of the existing methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the previous section, we have seen that each of the steps provides a less noisy and/or more plausible ghost map than the hard thresholding methods [26,29]. In this section, we compare the accuracy of the overall ghost map g = g w ∪ g l with those of the existing methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…When a pixel in the ghost map is 1, the corresponding pixel in the input frame will be included in the fusion process and vice versa. The proposed method begins by finding the reference frame that has the largest well-contrasted region (i.e., smallest saturated region) as in conventional methods [16,[24][25][26]29,30]. It needs to be noted that our method identifies the inconsistent pixels in high-contrast regions and low-contrast regions separately.…”
Section: Proposed Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For some examples, Jacobs et al [20] computed the local entropy of input images to detect regions with motions. Heo et al [16] and An et al [1], [3] computed the correlation between the images to reject the moving regions. Zhang and Cham [56] analyzed the magnitude and orientation of gradients to classify regions with and without motions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique indeed widens the dynamic range for the static scene. However, it suffers from ghost artifacts caused by moving objects and/or moving camera while capturing the scene, and thus needs complicated post-processing to remove the ghosts [23][24][25][26]. On the other hand, the space-division multiplexing methods using multiple sensors do not have ghost artifact problem, but they need complicated registration and interpolation process to match the view differences between the sensors [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%