Reduction of inequalities in health: assessing evidence-based tools

Abstract

BackgroundThe reduction of health inequalities is a focus of many national and international health organisations. The need for pragmatic evidence-based approaches has led to the development of a number of evidence-based equity initiatives. This paper describes a new program that focuses upon evidence- based tools, which are useful for policy initiatives that reduce inequities.MethodsThis paper is based on a presentation that was given at the "Regional Consultation on Policy Tools: Equity in Population Health Reports," held in Toronto, Canada in June 2002.ResultsFive assessment tools were presented. 1. A database of systematic reviews on the effects of educational, legal, social, and health interventions to reduce unfair inequalities is being established through the Cochrane and Campbell Collaborations. 2 Decision aids and shared decision making can be facilitated in disadvantaged groups by 'health coaches' to help people become better decision makers, negotiators, and navigators of the health system; a pilot study in Chile has provided proof of this concept. 3. The CIET Cycle: Combining adapted cluster survey techniques with qualitative methods, CIET's population based applications support evidence-based decision making at local and national levels. The CIET map generates maps directly from survey or routine institutional data, to be used as evidence-based decisions aids. Complex data can be displayed attractively, providing an important tool for studying and comparing health indicators among and between different populations. 4. The Ottawa Equity Gauge is applying the Global Equity Gauge Alliance framework to an industrialised country setting. 5 The Needs-Based Health Assessment Toolkit, established to assemble information on which clinical and health policy decisions can be based, is being expanded to ensure a focus on distribution and average health indicators.ConclusionEvidence-based planning tools have much to offer the goal of equitable health development.

Pediatric hospitalizations at two different setting community hospitals in north India: Implications for regionalization of care

“…The bedrock principle of equity in health service delivery appeared grossly violated in the study region. 18 It appears to be important to undertake rigorously conducted prospective studies in the region, to further highlight the factors operating for the differences noted in the present study. Such a study would first require collection of precise demographic information on the population of various socio-economic groups in the region; the population of children, number of live births, place of delivery etc.…”

Key components of knowledge transfer and exchange in health services research: Findings from a systematic scoping review

“…Jack and Tonmyr (Jack & Tonmyr,) applied Lavis’ model of KTE and referred to the importance of messages containing credible information. Occurring slightly less frequently was the operational element of the message as accessible , which was represented in as translating the knowledge or tailoring it for key stakeholders (Kitson et al.,; Tugwell, O'Connor, et al,). The final operational element noted was that multiple types of message are important , which reflected the use of different research methods to generate messages and the potential for research to have different messages to transfer.…”

Measuring inequalities in health: What do we know? What do we need to know?

“…Although some number of tools have been developed [98], there is a need to expand the evidence on what policies are achieving a reduction in inequalities, as pioneered in the Netherlands at the local level, and to communicate this research at an international level. Possibly, the main challenge to date lies in evaluating the impact of policies targeting socio-economic groups given the short supply of good-quality evidence to guide policy; the need of new and more consistent data for comparative national-level analysis, and further, a need to taking advantage of natural experiments (for example, changes in employment opportunities, housing provision or cigarette pricing).…”