2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2012.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction of misleading (“false”) positive results in mammalian cell genotoxicity assays. II. Importance of accurate toxicity measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Fowler et al did observe small concentration-related increases in MN frequency that did not reach statistical significance. In addition, in a follow-up publication [31], statistically-significant increases in MN were observed in TK6 cells treated with resorcinol at concentrations of 600, 700 and 1100 g/mL in the presence of cytochalasin B. As such the data from this present study were considered representative.…”
Section: Resorcinol (108-46-3)mentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, Fowler et al did observe small concentration-related increases in MN frequency that did not reach statistical significance. In addition, in a follow-up publication [31], statistically-significant increases in MN were observed in TK6 cells treated with resorcinol at concentrations of 600, 700 and 1100 g/mL in the presence of cytochalasin B. As such the data from this present study were considered representative.…”
Section: Resorcinol (108-46-3)mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…RLU was calculated per 1000 cells and an increase in caspase 3/7 activity was presented as a fold change relative to the solvent control [31]. Statistical analysis from the data from the followup experiment in the absence of cytochalsin-B was performed as described below.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Generally, it is recommended that cells from tissues/species of interest are used (i.e., liver cells to investigate hepatotoxicity and renal cells to predict nephrotoxicity), assuming the cell line or model best represent the in vivo situation. Some cell lines can infl uence assay outputs as shown by Fowler et al [ 22 ] who suggested that the use of human p-53 competent cell lines may reduce the incidence of false positives in genotoxicity assays. Cell lines with reduced or no metabolic capability (e.g., HepG2 cells) may reduce the ability to detect pro-toxicants that undergo metabolic transformation to produce toxic metabolites [ 23 ].…”
Section: Mechanistic Hcs Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, a miniaturized flow-cytometry based MN test was recently developed to detect chromosome damage, and it is now well proven that this method is a high-throughput technique capable of demonstrating both aneugenic and clastogenic effects simultaneously [16]. Given that p53 deficiency and inaccurate toxicity measurement are the two major reasons resulting in the seemingly high rate of false or misleading positive results, p53-proficient human hepatic cell lines (Hep G2) and more sensitive measurements of toxicity are better choices [17,18]. For this reason information on the two levels of DNA damage and chromosomal damage, including clastogenicity and aneugenicity, can be obtained to provide a comprehensive assessment of the genotoxic potential of source waters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%