2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2007.02.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction of [Mo2O5] by mercaptopropionic acid in an aqueous medium. Isolation and characterization of a dinuclear oxo- and 3-sulfido-proprionato(2-)-bridged molybdenum(IV) compound

Abstract: Reaction of Cp à 2 Mo 2 O 5 with HSCH 2 CH 2 COOH in acidic (by CF 3 COOH) 50:50 MeOH-H 2 O solvent at room temperature yields compound Cp à 2 Mo 2 (l-O)(l-SCH 2 CH 2 CO 2 ) 2 , a dinuclear diamagnetic Mo IV compound with a two-leg-sharing bis(four-legged piano stool) structure and a Mo-Mo distance of 2.6833(6) Å . A reaction monitoring by ESI MS shows the formation of an intermediate 18 mass units heavier, interpreted as a dihydroxo analogue. Electrochemistry shows a reversible, pH independent oxidation proce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the S–S bond length of the related literature complex, (2 RS ,5 SR )-2,5-diferrocenyl-1,6-dibenzoyl-3,4-dithiahexane, A , is 2.019 Å . This value appears to be representative for complexes containing a −CH 2 –CHR–S–S–CHR–CH 2 – chain fragment in its structure. By contrast, the S(1)–C(1) and S(2)–C(13) bond distances of 20 are on average 0.01–0.03 Å shorter than in these cited complexes. The C(1)–S(1)–­S(2)–C(13) dihedral angle of 20 , 90.2°, also compares well with the average of those of the cited literature complex (86.7°).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…For example, the S–S bond length of the related literature complex, (2 RS ,5 SR )-2,5-diferrocenyl-1,6-dibenzoyl-3,4-dithiahexane, A , is 2.019 Å . This value appears to be representative for complexes containing a −CH 2 –CHR–S–S–CHR–CH 2 – chain fragment in its structure. By contrast, the S(1)–C(1) and S(2)–C(13) bond distances of 20 are on average 0.01–0.03 Å shorter than in these cited complexes. The C(1)–S(1)–­S(2)–C(13) dihedral angle of 20 , 90.2°, also compares well with the average of those of the cited literature complex (86.7°).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…It is important to underline that the solution color during all these manipulation remained pale yellow, consistent with the fact that the metal maintains its d 0 configuration for the oxidation state þ6. During the analogous reaction of the Mo congener, on the other hand, the metal reduction to Mo IV was accompanied by a color change to deep red [19].…”
Section: Mercaptopropionic Acidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few years ago, we have reported on the interaction between [Cp * 2 Mo 2 O 5 ] and mercaptocarboxylic acids, HS(CH 2 ) n COOH (n ¼ 1, mercaptoacetic or thioglycolic acid [18]; n ¼ 2, mercaptopropionic acid [19]), which resulted in the isolation and characterization of dinuclear Mo IV products, [Cp * 2 Mo 2 (m-S)(m-SCH 2 COO) 2 ] in the first case and [Cp * 2 Mo 2 (m-O)(m-SCH 2 CH 2 COO) 2 ] in the latter. One of the reasons for investigating the interaction of these substrates, in particular the thioglycolic acid, with the Mo VI complex was as model for the action of cysteine in molybdenum hydroxylase enzymes [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison of the results obtained for the reduction of Compound [Cp * 2 Mo 2 O 5 ] has also been reduced by compounds containing a S-H bond, namely HS(CH 2 ) n COOH (n = 1, 2) in an aqueous environment (MeOH-H 2 O acidified with CF 3 COOH) [144,145]. These reactions leads to very similar dinuclear products of Mo IV with formula [(Cp * Mo) 2 (-S(CH 2 ) n CO 2 ) 2 (-E)], curiously differing by the nature of E (S for n = 1 [144] and O for n = 2 [145]), see Scheme 10.…”
Section: Reductive Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These reactions leads to very similar dinuclear products of Mo IV with formula [(Cp * Mo) 2 (-S(CH 2 ) n CO 2 ) 2 (-E)], curiously differing by the nature of E (S for n = 1 [144] and O for n = 2 [145]), see Scheme 10. The electrons for the reductions are provided by the S-H bonds, yielding compounds HOOC(CH 2 ) n SS(CH 2 ) n COOH which cocrystallize in each case with the organometallic product as H-bonded interstitial molecules.…”
Section: Reductive Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%