2010
DOI: 10.1155/2010/297519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction of Mutual Coupling and Return Loss in Microstrip Array Antennas Using Concave Rectangular Patches

Abstract: An effective solution to reduce both the mutual coupling and return loss of a microstrip array antenna consisting of rectangular patches is proposed. The patch is made concave in both horizontal and vertical sides. Applying the proposed structure to a microstrip array antenna having two elements, the effects of patch concavity on the mutual coupling and return loss are simulated and studied. To obtain a concave rectangular patch array antenna having low amounts of mutual coupling and return loss, the patch len… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A mismatch between the experimental results and simulations can be observed in Figures 7 and 8. Probable causes of the differences may be the losses attributable to the elements not considered in the design and simulation phase: uncertainties due to the manufacturing process, calibration or measurement errors, finite ground plane effects, influence of the metallic and electronic components of the device's complete hardware, properties of the transceiver and the communications protocol, but also other losses derived from the front-end of the measurement equipment, such as possible signal losses by impedance mismatch in the Tx or Rx antennas, in the coaxial cable that connects them to the spectrum analyzer or in the connectors [59][60][61][62][63][64]. It was not possible to perform any type of calibration to remove the losses associated with the transceiver interfaces, since it was not possible to establish any reference in the received signal if the battery-powered transceiver was used as transmitter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A mismatch between the experimental results and simulations can be observed in Figures 7 and 8. Probable causes of the differences may be the losses attributable to the elements not considered in the design and simulation phase: uncertainties due to the manufacturing process, calibration or measurement errors, finite ground plane effects, influence of the metallic and electronic components of the device's complete hardware, properties of the transceiver and the communications protocol, but also other losses derived from the front-end of the measurement equipment, such as possible signal losses by impedance mismatch in the Tx or Rx antennas, in the coaxial cable that connects them to the spectrum analyzer or in the connectors [59][60][61][62][63][64]. It was not possible to perform any type of calibration to remove the losses associated with the transceiver interfaces, since it was not possible to establish any reference in the received signal if the battery-powered transceiver was used as transmitter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under normal circumstances, the standard method provides an effective way to evaluate antenna performance, with good correspondence between the simulation results and the experimental results. However, sometimes these differences can be important as a result of the loss of control in the elements that influence the antennas or external effects [60][61][62][63][64][65][66]. The proposed method, despite its higher complexity, assumes many of the effects that can influence the performance of the antennas, so it can represent a better approach to reality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome this problem in microstrip array antennas, various methods, such as Split-Ring Resonators (SRR) [4], concave patches [5], waveguide-based metasurfaces [6], and defected ground structures (DGS) [7] have been presented. Although these techniques may provide noticeable mutual coupling reduction, they may have some drawbacks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The replacement of conventional patches with concave patches can slightly improve the mutual coupling through a straightforward approach. However, this approach slightly reduces the gain of each element, due to the reduction of effective aperture of each element [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Μια διαφορετική προσέγγιση καταπίεσης ακολούθησαν οι Mohanna et al[215] οι οποίοι, αντί να σχεδιάσουν κάποιο τύπο αποσυζεύκτη, παραμόρφωσαν το σχήμα των κεραιοστοιχείων. Δύο μικροταινιακές κεραίες εκτυπώθηκαν σε υπόστρωμα με κοινό επίπεδο γείωσης διαστάσεων 1.29λ × 1.96λ σε απόσταση d = 0.4λ.…”
unclassified