1977
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9150(77)90201-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction of myocardial reinfarction by the combined treatment with clofibrate and nicotinic acid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These include single and multifactor trials, and primary and secondary diet and drug trials. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] Two overview analyses have evaluated the effects of cholesterol lowering in clinical trials.20,21 They show that for every 1% cholesterol reduction a 2% CHD risk reduction is achieved. This 1:2 ratio is subsequently referred to as "the cholesterol benefit ratio."…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include single and multifactor trials, and primary and secondary diet and drug trials. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] Two overview analyses have evaluated the effects of cholesterol lowering in clinical trials.20,21 They show that for every 1% cholesterol reduction a 2% CHD risk reduction is achieved. This 1:2 ratio is subsequently referred to as "the cholesterol benefit ratio."…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier trials of secondary prevention of IHD were less consistent (Medical Research Council Research Committee 1968, Leren 1966, but recent studies with potent lipid-lowering drugs are encouraging. In the study by Carlson et al (1977) the combination of clofibrate with nicotinic acid halved the incidence of non-fatal reinfarction, with a non-significant decrease in fatal events. The trial by Dorr et al (1978) involved 2278 hypercholesterolaemic men, a more informative design than that of other studies which included subjects with 'normal' lipid levels and those with various types of hyperlipidaemia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Preliminary results are presented on the tentative classification of hyperlipoproteinaemia in tumour patients, using the lipid concentration threshold values advocated by Carlson et al (1977); an increased frequency of Type IV hyperlipoproteinaemia proved to be the most characteristic feature of tumour patients. The results are discussed in terms of the concept of the importance of lipid metabolic disturbances, primarily those due to ageing, in the genesis of the syndrome of "cancerophilia" (predisposition to cancer).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dilman & Bobrov, 1966;Feldman & Carter, 1971;Smethurst et al, 1975) (Dilman & Bobrov, 1966;Dilman et al, 1968;Tsyrlina et al, 1977;Berstein et al, 1978 (King, 1947), triglycerides were estimated according to the method of Carlson (1963), total :-lipoproteins (VLDL+ LDL) according to that of Ledvina & Coufalova (1960) and HDL-cholesterol was measured after removal of VLDL and LDL from the serum by precipitation wAith heparin and manganese chloride (Burstein & Scholnick, 1973). Threshold values of lipid concentrations for typing hyperlipoproteinaenmia wNere chosen according to the recommendations of Carlson et al (1977). Cases with cholesterol levels > 290 mg/100 ml and triglycerides < 180 mg/100 ml were referred to as Type Ila; cholesterol >290 mg/100 ml and triglycerides > 180 mg/100 ml-Type IIb, and cholesterol <290 mg/100 ml and triglycerides > 180 mg/100 ml-Type IV.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%