2020
DOI: 10.3344/kjp.2020.33.2.183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction of opioid intake after cooled radiofrequency denervation for sacroiliac joint pain: a retrospective evaluation up to 1 year

Abstract: Background: Opioids can present intolerable adverse side-effects to patients who use these analgesics to mitigate chronic pain. In this retrospective analysis, cooled radiofrequency (CRF) denervation was evaluated to provide pain and disability relief and reduce opioid use in patients with sacroiliac joint (SIJ) derived low back pain (LBP). Methods: Twenty-seven patients with pain from SIJ refractory to conservative treatments, and taking opioids chronically (> 3 mo), were included. Numeric rating scale (NRS) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the classic RF probe, the posterior curvature is not suitable for all sacral bone conformations, making positioning and ablation difficult. In addition, the probe cannot reach the L5 dorsal ramus from a single insertion point (9). Pulsed RF is the least frequently indicated approach for the SIJ because it does not create a nerve lesion; however, in both the present study and a previous study (10), a good result was obtained.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the classic RF probe, the posterior curvature is not suitable for all sacral bone conformations, making positioning and ablation difficult. In addition, the probe cannot reach the L5 dorsal ramus from a single insertion point (9). Pulsed RF is the least frequently indicated approach for the SIJ because it does not create a nerve lesion; however, in both the present study and a previous study (10), a good result was obtained.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…No complications were reported in this study and the adverse effects were mild. The possible complications reported in the literature are infection, hematoma, nerve injury, thromboembolism, secondary weakness, neuritis during the first week, dysesthesia and hypoesthesia in the buttocks, and temporary worsening of pain 5 to 10 days after the procedure (3,9) Cooled RF has a lower risk of tissue necrosis than conventional RF because it uses a lower temperature than the conventional technique (2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interventional pain procedures reduced opioid consumption [ 52 ], which is a cause of immune-suppression, which predisposes individuals to develop COVID-19 disease. Furthermore, interventional procedures can improve the quality of analgesia, provided that they are provided judiciously through evaluation on a case-by-case basis, ideally involving interdisciplinary team discussion [ 53 , 54 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These complications have been reported after RF in the sacroiliac joint using the conventional 5,6 and cooled technique. 6 Complications such as nerve damage, muscle weakness, neuritis, dysesthesia, and hypoesthesia are seen after conventional and cooled RF, which causes damage, while pulsed RF is associated with less nerve damage. Pulsed RF presents minimal risks when compared to neurolytic techniques, and is considered a safe procedure for these patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Possible complications of RF injury reported in the literature are infection, hematoma, thromboembolism, and temporary worsening of pain after 5 to 10 days. These complications have been reported after RF in the sacroiliac joint using the conventional 5,6 and cooled technique 6 . Complications such as nerve damage, muscle weakness, neuritis, dysesthesia, and hypoesthesia are seen after conventional and cooled RF, which causes damage, while pulsed RF is associated with less nerve damage.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%