2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11803-021-2054-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction of peak ground velocity by nonlinear soil response — II: excitation by a P-wave pulse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To be useful for engineering applications, the lessons learned then have to be extrapolated to the domain of damaging levels of strong motion amplitudes in a typical urban environment where soft sediments and soils will be associated to various degrees with nonlinear site response. 38,39 To a degree, the nonlinear site response can be beneficial because it reduces the power of strong motion waves entering into the structures, [40][41][42][43][44][45][46] but it also changes the site characteristics inferred from small amplitude, linear site response analyses. [47][48][49][50] Consequently, it is not sufficient to state that the data used for the analysis of κ correspond to a certain earthquake magnitude unless the distance to the fault is also documented.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To be useful for engineering applications, the lessons learned then have to be extrapolated to the domain of damaging levels of strong motion amplitudes in a typical urban environment where soft sediments and soils will be associated to various degrees with nonlinear site response. 38,39 To a degree, the nonlinear site response can be beneficial because it reduces the power of strong motion waves entering into the structures, [40][41][42][43][44][45][46] but it also changes the site characteristics inferred from small amplitude, linear site response analyses. [47][48][49][50] Consequently, it is not sufficient to state that the data used for the analysis of κ correspond to a certain earthquake magnitude unless the distance to the fault is also documented.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%