1993
DOI: 10.1051/agro:19930710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction of photosynthesis in sun leaves of Gossypium hirsutum L under conditions of high light intensities and suboptimal leaf temperatures

Abstract: Summary — Attached sun leaves of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L var Delta Pine 61) were enclosed in a gas exchange cuvette and exposed for 4 d to either 1 000 or 1 800 μmol photons m -2 s -1 and a series of air temperatures (35, 30, 25 and 20°C) (0) and in F V /F M . These 3 parameters were less severely affected by treatment with medium light intensity (1 000 μmol photons m -2 s -1 ). The data show that when sun leaves of cotton are exposed for short periods of time to temperatures only slightly … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Higher stomatal conductance combined with smaller leaf area decreases boundary layer resistance and increases energy dissipation (Nobel 1991), which further reduces leaf temperature. Several studies have shown substantial cooling of upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) foliage as an adaptation to high temperatures Nijs et al 1997), through higher stomatal conductance (Jarvis & Mansfield 1981;Koniger & Winter 1993;Mahan et al 1995). Stomatal conductance in Pima cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.) is genetically determined (Pettigrew et al 1993;Pettigrew & Meredith 1994;Lu et al 1996Lu et al , 1997 with quantitative genes involved in its expression (Percy et al 1996), and has been shown to be associated with heat resistance and higher yields .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher stomatal conductance combined with smaller leaf area decreases boundary layer resistance and increases energy dissipation (Nobel 1991), which further reduces leaf temperature. Several studies have shown substantial cooling of upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) foliage as an adaptation to high temperatures Nijs et al 1997), through higher stomatal conductance (Jarvis & Mansfield 1981;Koniger & Winter 1993;Mahan et al 1995). Stomatal conductance in Pima cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.) is genetically determined (Pettigrew et al 1993;Pettigrew & Meredith 1994;Lu et al 1996Lu et al , 1997 with quantitative genes involved in its expression (Percy et al 1996), and has been shown to be associated with heat resistance and higher yields .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, suboptimal temperatures can negatively affect the photosynthetic apparatus of cotton leaves, which is likely a major contributor to growth reductions. Königer and Winter (1993) reported a 60% reduction in photosynthesis in leaves exposed to high light and 25°C (only 5°C below the optimum temperature for cotton plants). Snider et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, suboptimal temperatures can negatively affect the photosynthetic apparatus of cotton leaves, which is likely a major contributor to growth reductions. Königer and Winter (1993) reported a 60% reduction in photosynthesis in leaves exposed to high light and 25°C (only 5°C below the optimum temperature for cotton plants). Snider et al (2018) documented significant reductions in performance (as much as 51%) and photosynthetic efficiency for multiple component processes of the thylakoid reactions under growth-limiting low temperature (20/15°C day/ night) during the first two weeks after planting, relative to optimal temperature conditions (30/20°C).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a study by Pettigrew (), with eight different cotton genotypes differing in leaf shape, reported higher photosynthetic rates in okra‐leaf genotypes due to higher chlorophyll content (13%) and smaller leaf area (37%) compared to normal‐leaf type genotypes. Net photosynthetic rate decreases with declines in temperature below the optimum (Hendrickson, Chow, & Furbank, ; Labate & Leegood, ), where 40% declines have been observed for cotton leaves at 20°C, relative to optimal temperature conditions (Königer & Winter, ). Previous work by Holaday, Martindale, Aired, Brooks, and Leegood () and Holaday, Mahan, and Payton () has indicated that low temperature decreases net photosynthesis via decreased stomatal conductance and/or biochemical limitations, including Rubisco deactivation under low temperatures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%