2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2004.04.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction of silver complexes: towards an ever more elaborated insight in the influence of the type of ligand on the reaction rate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…show the same initial I stat vs. E ramp, but the limiting current seems to be reached earlier in the case of DTO. These observations are not in correspondence with those in [1], where pure charge transfer effects were observed: the S 2 O 2À 3 system showed the slowest charge transfer, and depending on the potential range either DTO (at the less negative potentials) either SCN À (at the most negative potentials) was the fastest system.…”
Section: Steady State Reaction Rates From Chronoamperometric Experimentscontrasting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…show the same initial I stat vs. E ramp, but the limiting current seems to be reached earlier in the case of DTO. These observations are not in correspondence with those in [1], where pure charge transfer effects were observed: the S 2 O 2À 3 system showed the slowest charge transfer, and depending on the potential range either DTO (at the less negative potentials) either SCN À (at the most negative potentials) was the fastest system.…”
Section: Steady State Reaction Rates From Chronoamperometric Experimentscontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…The meaning of the cathodic charge transfer coefficient, defined as the potential-dependency of the activation energy for the reduction reaction, should therefore rather be changed into an 'apparent' cathodic charge transfer coefficient, including all the other potential-dependent symptoms involved in the electrochemical reaction. This also explains why the results are different in [1]: due to the difference in substrate, measurements were performed in different potential regions. Both the nature and the potential of the substrate influence surface reactions such as, e.g., adsorption.…”
Section: Steady State Reaction Rates From Chronoamperometric Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations