2011
DOI: 10.1016/s1001-6058(10)60141-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction of Stilling Basin Length with Tall end Sill

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure ( 15) indicates the theoretical relative energy loss derived from equation ( 6) and the experimental results, a well agreement can be clearly seen. Consequently, the derived equations can be used for designing stilling basins supported with screens in practical applications Figure ( 13) The relationship between theoretical F 1 of equation ( 11) and experimental Froude number Figure ( 14) The relationship between corrected theoretical F 1 of equation (11) and experimental Froude number Figure ( 15) The relationship between theoretical ΔE/E 1 of equation ( 6) and experimental ΔE/E 1.…”
Section: Verificationsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Figure ( 15) indicates the theoretical relative energy loss derived from equation ( 6) and the experimental results, a well agreement can be clearly seen. Consequently, the derived equations can be used for designing stilling basins supported with screens in practical applications Figure ( 13) The relationship between theoretical F 1 of equation ( 11) and experimental Froude number Figure ( 14) The relationship between corrected theoretical F 1 of equation (11) and experimental Froude number Figure ( 15) The relationship between theoretical ΔE/E 1 of equation ( 6) and experimental ΔE/E 1.…”
Section: Verificationsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The water surface profiles in the case of changing the screen widths are shown in Figure ( 14) to Figure ( 16) for the submergence ratios 3.00, 4.00 and 4.50 and the relative widths of screen Bs/b 1.0, 0.92, 0.7 and 0.43. It can be clearly seen that the less of the relative screen width is, the higher water surface profile is front and back of the screen as shown in Figure ( 15)It was noticed that with increasing the Bs/b ratio, the lower water surface profile decreases as indicated in Figure ( 16). It can be concluded that the best results occur in the case of presence the screen with a whole width of the contracted part of the waterway.…”
Section: The Water Surface Profilementioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations