1977
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.74.11.5118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction of syngeneic tumor growth by an anti-I-J-alloantiserum.

Abstract: Highly significant suppression of the growth of S1509a and Sa-I syngeneic sarcomas was observed in A/J mice following daily intravenous injections of 2 ;&l of anti-I-Jk alloantiserum. This effect persisted as long as the anti-I-Jk serum was administered (day 15). In contrast, a control anti-I-Js serum had no discernible effect on the growth of the S1509a tumor. The inhibitory activity of the anti-I-k serum on the growth of the tumor was absorbed specifically by B10BR spleen cells bearing I-Jk determinants. In … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
1

Year Published

1978
1978
1985
1985

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A possible explanation might be the influence of circulating tumour antigens on immune surveillance as -potential inducers of suppressor cells. Suppressor T cells responsive to tumour antigens prevent both the generation (Greene et al, 1977a, b) and expression (Asherson & Zembala, 1976) of T effector cells. These suppressor T cells persist after surgical removal of the tumour (Fujimoto et al, 1976) whereas the direct blocking effect of tumour antigens and its irnmune complexes against T effector cells observed with tumour-bearer sera disappears within a few days after tumour removal (Hellstr6m et al, 1970).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible explanation might be the influence of circulating tumour antigens on immune surveillance as -potential inducers of suppressor cells. Suppressor T cells responsive to tumour antigens prevent both the generation (Greene et al, 1977a, b) and expression (Asherson & Zembala, 1976) of T effector cells. These suppressor T cells persist after surgical removal of the tumour (Fujimoto et al, 1976) whereas the direct blocking effect of tumour antigens and its irnmune complexes against T effector cells observed with tumour-bearer sera disappears within a few days after tumour removal (Hellstr6m et al, 1970).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adult thymectomy and administration of small doses of Cytoxan or antisera directed at the IJ subregion of the major histocompatibility complex in the mouse have also been shown to eliminate suppressor T-cell functions both in vio and in vitro (33)(34)(35). Moreover, diminished suppressor cell function was associated with both enhanced antibody formation and the capacity to generate cytotoxic cells to modified self or syngeneic tumor cells.…”
Section: Reactivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Graft acceptance may also be prolonged if grafts depleted of passenger lymphocytes activate suppressor cells in the recipient, thus leading to a state of tolerance. Cellular (4,5) and humoral (6, 7) immunity have been shown to be regulated by antigen-specific suppressor T lymphocytes. Such suppressor cells, which express I-J determinants (8), probably inhibit both T helper cells and B cells stimulated by an antigenic challenge and lead to antigen-specific nonresponsiveness.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such suppressor cells, which express I-J determinants (8), probably inhibit both T helper cells and B cells stimulated by an antigenic challenge and lead to antigen-specific nonresponsiveness. Suppressor cells have been shown to be important in tumor immunity (9) and in unresponsiveness to tissue allografts in mice rendered tolerant neonatally (10). Treatment of mice with specific anti-I-J sera increases primary antibody responses (11) and suppresses tumor growth (12), presumably by eliminating I-J-bearing suppressor T cells.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation