1925
DOI: 10.1086/142890
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction of the Harvard-Groningen Durchmusterung to the International System of Magnitude and Color

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1931
1931
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, when all the Areas of the MWC were considered and averaged together in the distribution tables of the early papers, binned as they were only by Galactic latitude, not by longitude as well (cf. Seares et al 1925aSeares et al , 1925b, the large systematic differences shown in Table 12 were extremes and were missed.…”
Section: The Color Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Hence, when all the Areas of the MWC were considered and averaged together in the distribution tables of the early papers, binned as they were only by Galactic latitude, not by longitude as well (cf. Seares et al 1925aSeares et al , 1925b, the large systematic differences shown in Table 12 were extremes and were missed.…”
Section: The Color Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New star counts in B are compared with the earlier counts listed by Seares et al (1925b) and discussed log N(m ) pg further by Seares & Joyner (1928). Because the area covered by the original Mount Wilson work is so small, being a circular region of diameter 23Ј (0.115 deg 2 ), Seares et al (1925b) originally augmented their data using counts of brighter stars in the much larger area of each of the fields that are listed in the Durchmusterung of Selected Areas (Pickering & Kapteyn 1918;Pickering, Kapteyn, & van Rhijn 1923, 1924, as reduced to the international scale by Seares, Joyner, & Richmond (1925a). The total data were summarized by van Rhijn (1929) in his homogenization of many individual sources.…”
Section: The Present Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation