2018
DOI: 10.12681/jhvms.15636
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction rate of nematode egg counts and third-stage larvae development from sheep and goat faeces preserved at 4οC

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Gastrointestinal nematode parasites cause major production losses to small ruminants. The most common way to diagnose or monitor the worm burdens in sheep and goats remains the quantitative parasitological examinations, i.e. the faecal egg counts. However, the reliability of the results of such methods depends greatly on the conditions and duration of the storage of the faecal samples prior to examination. The aim of this research was to evaluate the reduction rate and the maximum storage period, wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Variables considered included the year and the Julian date of sampling to account for intra and inter-annual variations in environmental conditions and population densities. We corrected for part of the sampling variance by adding the number of days between sampling and coproscopic analyses in the models since it can impact the number of fecal egg and oocyst counted [159, 160]. We only considered individuals for which less than 30 days elapsed between the sampling and laboratory analyses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variables considered included the year and the Julian date of sampling to account for intra and inter-annual variations in environmental conditions and population densities. We corrected for part of the sampling variance by adding the number of days between sampling and coproscopic analyses in the models since it can impact the number of fecal egg and oocyst counted [159, 160]. We only considered individuals for which less than 30 days elapsed between the sampling and laboratory analyses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Faecal eggs counts (FEC) and faecal oocysts counts (FOC) tend to decrease as the time elapsed between faeces collection (i.e. sampling date) and coproscopic analyses increases (Drimtzia and Papadopoulos, 2016;Portanier et al, 2019), but the date in which coproscopic analyses were performed was nevertheless not available for all the samples. During the study period, the number of persons available to analyse the faecal samples varied.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the seasonality of parasitism (Wilson et al, 2004;Magi et al, 2005;Balicka-Ramisz et al, 2017), we expected to observe an influence of the sampling date on FEC and FOC and thus included the day of year of sampling in models (sampling date). We also tested for an influence of the time elapsed between faeces collection and coproscopic analyses (delay) (Drimtzia and Papadopoulos, 2016;Portanier et al, 2019). Only samples with a delay ⩽30 days were considered in the analyses.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%