2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11244-017-0862-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction Site in Ce n V m O k + Revealed by Gas Phase Thermal Desorption Spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar concomitant intensity changes were appreciable above 900 K between Co n H + and Co n + ( n = 5–10) in Figure , although much less pronounced, suggesting that one H atom may be released from Co n H + . The energy required to release one H atom from Co 5 H + was 2.47 eV, Co 5 H + Co 5 + + normalH goodbreak0em1em⁣ normalΔ E = prefix+ 2.47 0.25em eV On the other hand, the energy required to release one H atom from Co 5 H – was 2.72 eV, Co 5 H Co 5 + normalH goodbreak0em1em⁣ normalΔ E = prefix+ 2.72 0.25em eV which can be too high for the H atom release to be observed clearly below 1000 K. Moreover, for Co n H – ( n = 7–9) as discussed later, Co n H – increased and Co n – decreased in the abundance fraction with the temperature, which cannot be explained by the H atom release. These changes were surely caused by another mechanism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar concomitant intensity changes were appreciable above 900 K between Co n H + and Co n + ( n = 5–10) in Figure , although much less pronounced, suggesting that one H atom may be released from Co n H + . The energy required to release one H atom from Co 5 H + was 2.47 eV, Co 5 H + Co 5 + + normalH goodbreak0em1em⁣ normalΔ E = prefix+ 2.47 0.25em eV On the other hand, the energy required to release one H atom from Co 5 H – was 2.72 eV, Co 5 H Co 5 + normalH goodbreak0em1em⁣ normalΔ E = prefix+ 2.72 0.25em eV which can be too high for the H atom release to be observed clearly below 1000 K. Moreover, for Co n H – ( n = 7–9) as discussed later, Co n H – increased and Co n – decreased in the abundance fraction with the temperature, which cannot be explained by the H atom release. These changes were surely caused by another mechanism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In thermal desorption spectrometry experiments, the clusters travel down a 116 mm long extension of the reaction zone formed by a copper tube of larger diameter, which reduces the number of reactive collisions. [76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85] Crucially, this tube is thermally isolated from the reaction zone and can thus be heated without significantly changing the temperatures of the source and the subsequent reaction zone. In addition, the helium carrier gas cannot escape and forms a thermal link with the heated tube wall, thus ensuring that the reaction products thermalize.…”
Section: Rhodium Cluster Production and Reaction Under Thermalized Co...mentioning
confidence: 99%