2003
DOI: 10.1086/345922
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reductions in Fluvial Sediment Discharge by Coastal Dams in California and Implications for Beach Sustainability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
126
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
126
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1). Average sediment trapping efficiency for dams in the central California coastal region have been estimated as ~ 84% by Willis and Griggs (2003) with the simple Brune (1953) method.…”
Section: Study Region Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). Average sediment trapping efficiency for dams in the central California coastal region have been estimated as ~ 84% by Willis and Griggs (2003) with the simple Brune (1953) method.…”
Section: Study Region Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). Although approximately 54 % of the southern California watershed is controlled by dams, this region of southern California has relatively few dams (Willis and Griggs 2003). A combination of steep slopes and intense, isolated periods of rainfall have yielded daily averaged suspended sediment concentration beyond 70,000 mg/L several times throughout the stream gauge record (Warrick and Farnsworth 2009a).…”
Section: Regional Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dune ecosystems provide protection against flooding [48], though beach width and sediment supply are also relevant [91]. While there is sea level rise of 2.2-2.5 mm per year in Galicia, there are also cases of dune propagations exceeding 100 m per year [60,92,93].…”
Section: Resilience Indicators-beach Structurementioning
confidence: 99%