2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2019.09.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reductions in peak knee abduction moment in three previously studied gait modification strategies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
18
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed algorithm estimated the FPA based on the peak foot deceleration measured before heel-strike, so theoretically the estimation can be finished immediately after mid-stance. Therefore, this algorithm can potentially enable FPA feedback during the second half of stance phase, which is an important prerequisite for real-time FPA modification research [5], [36], [37]. A different FPA estimation strategy can be based on the peak foot acceleration during the first half of swing phase, but this strategy requires IMU data captured after toe-off for estimation, making the real-time FPA feedback infeasible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed algorithm estimated the FPA based on the peak foot deceleration measured before heel-strike, so theoretically the estimation can be finished immediately after mid-stance. Therefore, this algorithm can potentially enable FPA feedback during the second half of stance phase, which is an important prerequisite for real-time FPA modification research [5], [36], [37]. A different FPA estimation strategy can be based on the peak foot acceleration during the first half of swing phase, but this strategy requires IMU data captured after toe-off for estimation, making the real-time FPA feedback infeasible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies found that reducing KAM with gait modi cations does not necessarily also change medKCF because other joint loading parameters as KFM or muscle co-contraction might be affected 11,30,31 . A possible successful gait modi cation for reducing medKCF could be in-toeing that potentially reduces KAM but not substantially affecting KFM [32][33][34] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of gait modifications have been identified that may help reduce the JRF in the medial compartment of the knee. Three common modifications investigated include lateral trunk lean (LTL) [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14], medial knee thrust (MKT) [7-9, 11, 15-19], and toe-in gait (TIG) [7-9, 11, 17, 20]. A systematic review of gait interventions [7] found that when paired with real-time biofeedback (RTB), the three interventions chosen for this study show the greatest potential to reduce the knee adduction moment (KAM) in patients with knee OA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LTL modification has been shown to reduce KAM when the trunk angle is modified by a sufficient amount [6,9,35,36] but it has also been reported that the modification may lead to discomfort in the spine and ipsilateral knee and hip joints [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%