2005
DOI: 10.1080/10889860500276474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reductive Dechlorination of Tetrachloroethene Following Abiotic Versus Biotic Reduction of Hexavalent Chromium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…genus (22,49,50) and most of the RDases are membrane-bound (22,48,51) and potentially susceptible to direct contact with bare NZVI. Previous studies with Dehalococcoides show that strong reductants (e.g., S 2-) greatly reduce halorespiration activity (52).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…genus (22,49,50) and most of the RDases are membrane-bound (22,48,51) and potentially susceptible to direct contact with bare NZVI. Previous studies with Dehalococcoides show that strong reductants (e.g., S 2-) greatly reduce halorespiration activity (52).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Jeyasingh and Philip (2005) and Desjardin et al (2002) using sterile and inoculated soils showed that the addition of a carbon source alone has almost no effect on Cr(VI) reduction indicating that biotic activities are leading to Cr(VI) reduction. However, most studies have tested microbial reduction capacity for Cr(VI) in pure cultures, and isolated and controlled systems and only few of them have used real soils (Salunkhe et al, 1998;Tseng and Bielefeldt, 2002;Oliver et al, 2003;Tokunaga et al, 2003a;Freedman et al, 2005;Srivastava and Thakur 2006;Faybishenko et al, 2008;Papasiopi et al, 2009) and fewer have referred to the reduction mechanism that occur in the field, despite bacteria capable of reducing Cr(VI) to Cr(III) are readily isolated from soil (Turick et al, 1996;Camargo et al, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%