Iron Oxides 2016
DOI: 10.1002/9783527691395.ch3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reductive Dissolution and Reactivity of Ferric (Hydr)oxides: New Insights and Implications for Environmental Redox Processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It appears that high sulfate concentrations in the groundwater, together with the abundance of microbially available organic C within fine-grained, reducing lenses (Supporting Information, Table SI-1), stimulated sulfate reduction within and along the edges of lenses to produce aqueous sulfide that dispersed within the groundwater (Figure ). The sustained sulfide supply drove reductive dissolution of Fe­(III) oxides to aqueous Fe­(II), producing zero-valent S and releasing adsorbed As, as shown in previous studies. Zero-valent S is not very stable in the aqueous phase at pH 8, where it will likely react with sulfide to form polysulfides or with other species, such as As­(III), unless it is partitioned to the solid phase (as seen in the aquifer sand before the first reducing lens in this study). On the influent (upstream) side of the first fine-grained, reducing lens, it appears that aqueous Fe­(II) concentrations were too low to precipitate FeS (Figure ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…It appears that high sulfate concentrations in the groundwater, together with the abundance of microbially available organic C within fine-grained, reducing lenses (Supporting Information, Table SI-1), stimulated sulfate reduction within and along the edges of lenses to produce aqueous sulfide that dispersed within the groundwater (Figure ). The sustained sulfide supply drove reductive dissolution of Fe­(III) oxides to aqueous Fe­(II), producing zero-valent S and releasing adsorbed As, as shown in previous studies. Zero-valent S is not very stable in the aqueous phase at pH 8, where it will likely react with sulfide to form polysulfides or with other species, such as As­(III), unless it is partitioned to the solid phase (as seen in the aquifer sand before the first reducing lens in this study). On the influent (upstream) side of the first fine-grained, reducing lens, it appears that aqueous Fe­(II) concentrations were too low to precipitate FeS (Figure ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…So far, it is commonly accepted for ferritins in general that further oxidation can concomitantly occur through an autocatalytic reaction for which the ferrous ions can enter and be oxidized at the ferric mineral surface in the presence of the oxidant co-substrate,w ithout which no oxidation has been described to be possible.S urprisingly,i nt his work, we demonstrate that even in the absence of co-substrate iron sequestration and mineralization is possible.T he data suggests that not only the 57 Fe II was oxidized, it was also incorporated into the bulk mineral structure,g iven the spectral similarity with the iron reacted with H 2 O 2 sample and the presence of mix-valence species.T his phenomenon has been observed by Silvester et al [34] and Williams and Scherer [35] in abiotic systems.T he authors showed that Fe II could adsorb to the surface of synthetic minerals (goethite and hydrous ferric oxide hydrate) and be completely oxidized in anoxic environments,t hrough electron transfer reactions from the aqueous Fe II to the solid ferric mineral. Thet wo models proposed for the heterogeneous reaction of aqueous Fe II with synthetic ferric iron oxides,r ecently reviewed by Peiffer and Wana nd Gorski and Scherer, [36,37] involve electron transfer between aqueous Fe II ions and the solid ferric mineral. These electrons can be trapped in the ferric oxide structure,aslocalized or delocalized charges,ormay be released into solution in the form of Fe II ions through reductive dissolution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These electrons can be trapped in the ferric oxide structure,aslocalized or delocalized charges,ormay be released into solution in the form of Fe II ions through reductive dissolution. Adsorption and incorporation of aqueous Fe II ions contributing to the mineral growth, without dissolution of the mineral [36,38] is an alternative model that can lead to mineral transformation. Under the experimental conditions used, our data supports anet oxidation reaction of Fe II ions in the absence of an oxidant co-substrate through detection of delocalized trapped electrons in the core structure and absence of aqueous octahedral Fe II species in the Mçssbauer spectrum ( Supporting Information, Figure S6A).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This fraction was referred to as 'surface bound Fe(II)' in Poulton et al (2004) or 'excess Fe(II)' in Hellige et al (2012). It was proposed that this excess Fe(II) is associated with the surface (Hellige et al, 2012;Poulton, 2003;Poulton et al, 2004) or consists of electron equivalents stored in the surface layers of the bulk mineral (Peiffer and Wan, 2016).…”
Section: A Novel Pathway For Pyrite Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%