2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00222-018-0805-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reductive groups, the loop Grassmannian, and the Springer resolution

Abstract: In this paper we prove equivalences of categories relating the derived category of a block of the category of representations of a connected reductive algebraic group over an algebraically closed field of characteristic p bigger than the Coxeter number and a derived category of equivariant coherent sheaves on the Springer resolution (or a parabolic counterpart). In the case of the principal block, combined with previous results, this provides a modular version of celebrated constructions due to Arkhipov-Bezruk… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
62
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(214 reference statements)
1
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let k be an algebraic closure of k, and assume that the characteristic of k is strictly bigger than the Coxeter number of G. Then the formula of Proposition 4.18 is related to Donkin's tensor product theorem for tilting modules of the Langlands dual k-group G ∨ k as follows. In [RW,AR2,AMRW] the authors construct a "degrading functor" η : Parity IW (Fl • , k) → Tilt prin (G ∨ k ), where Fl • is the connected component of the base point in Fl, Parity IW (Fl • , k) is the category of (I + u , χ * I + (L k ψ ))-equivariant parity complexes on Fl • , and Tilt prin (G ∨ k ) denotes the category of tilting objects in the (non-extended) principal block of the category of finite-dimensional G ∨ k -modules. We expect that Donkin's tensor product theorem (see [Ja,§E.9]) can be explained geometrically by an isomorphism of complexes involving the functor Z .…”
Section: Recall That the Forgetful Functor Formentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let k be an algebraic closure of k, and assume that the characteristic of k is strictly bigger than the Coxeter number of G. Then the formula of Proposition 4.18 is related to Donkin's tensor product theorem for tilting modules of the Langlands dual k-group G ∨ k as follows. In [RW,AR2,AMRW] the authors construct a "degrading functor" η : Parity IW (Fl • , k) → Tilt prin (G ∨ k ), where Fl • is the connected component of the base point in Fl, Parity IW (Fl • , k) is the category of (I + u , χ * I + (L k ψ ))-equivariant parity complexes on Fl • , and Tilt prin (G ∨ k ) denotes the category of tilting objects in the (non-extended) principal block of the category of finite-dimensional G ∨ k -modules. We expect that Donkin's tensor product theorem (see [Ja,§E.9]) can be explained geometrically by an isomorphism of complexes involving the functor Z .…”
Section: Recall That the Forgetful Functor Formentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present we know much more about the category of algebraic representations than of kGpF q q (e.g. compare the induction theorems of [ABG04,HKS16,AR16c] with the solution of Broué's conjecture for SL 2 pF q q [Chu01, Oku00]).…”
Section: It Turns Out That Indmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another grading on Rep 0 is constructed in [AR16c]. These two gradings should be related by Koszul duality.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper draws inspiration from [AR1], which (in the setting of parity complexes on flag varieties) introduced the notions of "mixed derived category" and "mixed perverse sheaves." These notions have since found important applications in modular representation theory; see in particular [AR1,ARd2,MaR,AR2,AMRW2].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In[AR2], for simplicity this claim is stated only in the case k is a field. But the same arguments apply in the present generality; see e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%