2013
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0000545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Redundancy and Robustness in the Design and Evaluation of Bridges: European and North American Perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…System safety was introduced to structural engineering domain after the collapse of the Ronan Point apartment building in London in 1968; structural redundancy and robustness are regarded as the indicators of structural system safety. In the last 30 years, attempts to measure structural redundancy and robustness have been made by researchers [11]. For the bridge system evaluation, methods proposed by Frangopol and Curley [12,13] and Ghosn and Moses [14][15][16] have been adopted by the bridge standards and codes in America.…”
Section: Bridge System Performance Evaluation Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…System safety was introduced to structural engineering domain after the collapse of the Ronan Point apartment building in London in 1968; structural redundancy and robustness are regarded as the indicators of structural system safety. In the last 30 years, attempts to measure structural redundancy and robustness have been made by researchers [11]. For the bridge system evaluation, methods proposed by Frangopol and Curley [12,13] and Ghosn and Moses [14][15][16] have been adopted by the bridge standards and codes in America.…”
Section: Bridge System Performance Evaluation Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hendawi and Frangopol (1994) defined redundancy as the ratio between the reliability index of the intact system in a generic time instant and the difference of reliability indexes calculated for the intact and damaged system at the same time instant (see also Frangopol, 2009, 2010b). Such difference can be seen as a measure of the availability of system warning before the entire structural system failure (Anitori et al, 2013). Ghosn et al (2016b) extended the field of application of structural redundancy also at the network-level; • Structural robustness: PI quantifying the ability of a structural system to suffer damage induced by the occurrence of an extreme action (Ghosn and Moses, 1998;Liu et al, 2000;Saydam and Frangopol, 2011;Sorensen et al, 2012).…”
Section: Research Technical Performance Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ghosn et al (2016b) extended the field of application of structural redundancy also at the network-level; • Structural robustness: PI quantifying the ability of a structural system to suffer damage induced by the occurrence of an extreme action (Ghosn and Moses, 1998;Liu et al, 2000;Saydam and Frangopol, 2011;Sorensen et al, 2012). Starossek and Haberland (2011), Anitori et al (2013) and Cavaco et al (2013) summarized different measures (deterministic, probabilistic and risk-based) for this indicator. Recently the concept of robustness has been extended to the case of systems under deterioration occurring progressively due to aging and environmental effects (Baker et al, 2008).…”
Section: Research Technical Performance Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main reasons are a better use of different materials and some interesting and competitive possibilities, regarding construction sequence (Pedro & Reis, 2010;Reis, 2005;Reis & Pedro, 2004). In urban viaducts where the downtime traffic pause is the main constrain (Anitori, Casas, & Ghosn, 2013;Bradford et al, 2001), the use of composite structures with prior metal assembly (Kim & Yoo, 2006), as proven to be an efficient solution, in which the steel part will support the liquid concrete, without the need of main formwork connected to the ground (Brozzetti, 2000). The main composite steel-concrete girders have elements that may suffer from local buckling (Ranzi & Zona, 2007), as in the case of steel plated double girders sections the web slenderness is around 120 (Davison & Owens, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%