2014
DOI: 10.3176/arch.2014.2.02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Redwares From Gubbacka’s Medieval Village: Regional and Inter-Regional Views on Ceramic Networks and Technology (Sem-Eds)

Abstract: The medieval village site of Gubbacka is situated in the today's Vantaa, Finland. Archaeological investigations were conducted at the site in 2002-2003 and 2008-2010. The aim of this paper is to explore the social and trade contacts and networks the rural inhabitants of Gubbacka had within the Baltic Sea region. In order to examine how these relationships are reflected in the ceramic materials from the site, redware sherds were sampled for micro-structural and compositional characterization by a scanning elect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Methodologically, we evaluated the challenges and potentials of geochemical discrimination of grogtempered archaeological ceramics. Successful geochemical discrimination of ceramic fabrics using SEM-EDS has also been demonstrated previously and with grog-tempered fabrics (Holmqvist et al, 2014;Spataro, 2011;Zuluaga et al, 2011), yet a high-sensitivity method, such as PIXE, complements the SEM-EDS analysis by extending the elemental variety available for data interpretation and group assignments. The SEM-EDS and PIXE data sets show clear correlation in the data patterns (e.g., correlation coefficient R for SEM-EDS/PIXE measured CaO/Ca and FeO/Fe was 0.7 and 0.8, respectively, elements lighter than Ca were not measured with PIXE; see Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Methodologically, we evaluated the challenges and potentials of geochemical discrimination of grogtempered archaeological ceramics. Successful geochemical discrimination of ceramic fabrics using SEM-EDS has also been demonstrated previously and with grog-tempered fabrics (Holmqvist et al, 2014;Spataro, 2011;Zuluaga et al, 2011), yet a high-sensitivity method, such as PIXE, complements the SEM-EDS analysis by extending the elemental variety available for data interpretation and group assignments. The SEM-EDS and PIXE data sets show clear correlation in the data patterns (e.g., correlation coefficient R for SEM-EDS/PIXE measured CaO/Ca and FeO/Fe was 0.7 and 0.8, respectively, elements lighter than Ca were not measured with PIXE; see Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The interpretation of the mineral identification results was confirmed by the X-ray diffraction analysis [11,12]. The result obtained by SEM-EDX analysis revealed the basic technologies related to obtaining pottery and ceramic objects, as well as the type of clay mineral components [20]. Fig.…”
Section: Scanning Electron Microscopy -Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectr...mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…SEM‐EDX, a non‐destructive method, determined the precise mineralogical elemental composition and information of the microstructure, grain size and surface treatment of archaeological pottery (Freestone and Middleton 1987; Palanivel and Meyvel 2010; Holmqvist et al . 2014; Kılıç et al . 2017), while XRD facilitates a detailed description of the fabric of the two vessels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%