2018
DOI: 10.1007/s40670-018-00652-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reevaluating Biochemistry and Nutrition Education Through Opinions of Clinicians and Educators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is a major focus of K-12 science standards and undergraduate biology education [17,18] and is a key pathway for understanding processes in biochemistry. Moreover, medical clinicians and educators have identified the Central Dogma as one of the most important and relevant topics to teach in biochemistry [19]. However, undergraduates and medical students frequently do not share this sentiment, but rather perceive biochemistry as irrelevant and having little application to their future careers in medicine or other health care fields [20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a major focus of K-12 science standards and undergraduate biology education [17,18] and is a key pathway for understanding processes in biochemistry. Moreover, medical clinicians and educators have identified the Central Dogma as one of the most important and relevant topics to teach in biochemistry [19]. However, undergraduates and medical students frequently do not share this sentiment, but rather perceive biochemistry as irrelevant and having little application to their future careers in medicine or other health care fields [20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%