2021
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.104.l071301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reevaluating reactor antineutrino spectra with new measurements of the ratio between U235 and Pu

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was suggested by Kopeikin et al, that this discrepancy is likely due to an overestimation of the absolute normalization of 235 U at ILL. Under this assumption, the re-evaluated flux (KI model) based on the modified normalization produces IBD yields that agree with reactor flux and evolution measurements within 1σ [17], reducing the significance of the original motivation for the RAA. Though is appears likely that a normalization error contributed to the original RAA, the KI model does not preclude sterile neutrinos from existing in this parameter space as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Recent Results Further Complicate the Short Baseline Os-cill...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was suggested by Kopeikin et al, that this discrepancy is likely due to an overestimation of the absolute normalization of 235 U at ILL. Under this assumption, the re-evaluated flux (KI model) based on the modified normalization produces IBD yields that agree with reactor flux and evolution measurements within 1σ [17], reducing the significance of the original motivation for the RAA. Though is appears likely that a normalization error contributed to the original RAA, the KI model does not preclude sterile neutrinos from existing in this parameter space as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Recent Results Further Complicate the Short Baseline Os-cill...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ν e → ν e has now been updated by the data collected by BEST [49], which strongly favors rather large mixing angle and masses larger than 1 eV 2 . Concerning the reactor anomalies, a recent reevaluation of the neutrino fluxes [50] has led to new global analyses [51,52] showing that combined reactor data are consistent with no sterile-neutrino oscillations. Despite the recent progress in all oscillation channels, new experimental data is still needed to fully assess the sterile neutrino option.…”
Section: A Active-sterile Neutrino Oscillationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deficit of ν e in the calibration of the SAGE and GALEX experimets with radioactive sources [1,2] ("Galium Anomaly"(GA)) and the deficit in reactor νe fluxes [3,4] ("Reactor Antineutrino Anomaly"(RAA)) can be explained by active-sterile neutrino oscillations with the best-fit values for sterile neutrino parameters of ∆m 2 41 = 2.4 eV 2 and sin 2 2θ ee = 0.14 [5,6]. New measurements [7,8] of beta spectra of fission products of 235 U and 239 Pu give 5.4% smaller ratio than the ILL results used for predictions of the νe fluxes from reactors [3,4]. This can explain RAA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%