2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2016.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reevaluating the functional implications of Australopithecus afarensis navicular morphology

Abstract: The longitudinal arch is a unique characteristic of the human foot, yet the timing and pattern of its evolution remain controversial, in part due to the disagreement among researchers over which skeletal traits are the best indicators of its presence or absence. The small size of the human navicular tuberosity has previously been linked to the presence of a longitudinal arch, implying that the large tuberosity of early hominins such as Australopithecus afarensis reflects a flat foot. However, this hypothesis i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are no significant differences among series or between sexes. Our results are similar to those found by other authors (Manners-Smith; Prang, 2016;Pablos et al), and they move away from extreme values such as those Manners-Smith (70 %) and Gomberg (1981)…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…There are no significant differences among series or between sexes. Our results are similar to those found by other authors (Manners-Smith; Prang, 2016;Pablos et al), and they move away from extreme values such as those Manners-Smith (70 %) and Gomberg (1981)…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Human-like morphologies do not necessarily signify a loss of midfoot mobility, as some have argued (Langdon et al, 1991;DeSilva, 2010;Ward et al, 2011;Proctor, 2013;Prang, 2016a).…”
Section: Midfoot Kinematics During Bipedal Walkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some have argued for the presence of a longitudinal arch by 3.2 Ma in Australopithecus afarensis based on features such as fourth metatarsal torsion (Ward et al, 2011; but see Drapeau and Harmon, 2013) and joint articular surface orientation (DeSilva and Throckmorton, 2010;Prang, 2015), but others have pointed to the possession of a robust navicular tuberosity as evidence that Au. afarensis was supporting weight with its medial midfoot and thus lacked a medial arch (Sarmiento and Marcus, 2000;Harcourt-Smith and Aiello, 2004; but see Prang, 2016a). However, the position and mobility of the hallux of Au.…”
Section: Evolution Of the Longitudinal Arch Of The Footmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The navicular is also implicated as important in understanding foot function (Berillon, ; Clarke & Tobias, ; Harcourt‐Smith & Aiello, ; Morton, ; Peeters et al, ; Sarmiento & Marcus, ). However, the role of its morphology in identifying the presence of a longitudinal arch remains unclear (Prang, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%