1999
DOI: 10.1006/drev.1999.0495
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reevaluating the Identity Status Paradigm: Still Useful after 35 Years

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
129
1
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 205 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
6
129
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The identity achievement status is clearly the most developmentally sophisticated status, with diffusion being the least sophisticated, as was postulated in Erikson's theory (e.g., Berzonsky & Adams, 1999;Waterman, 1999).…”
Section: Two Dimensions Of Adaptive Psychological Functioningmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The identity achievement status is clearly the most developmentally sophisticated status, with diffusion being the least sophisticated, as was postulated in Erikson's theory (e.g., Berzonsky & Adams, 1999;Waterman, 1999).…”
Section: Two Dimensions Of Adaptive Psychological Functioningmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Adams (Adams, 1999;Berzonsky & Adams, 1999) points out, there are 64 possible patterns for identity development with four status categories, and three measurement points for each domain. Therefore, it was not possible to follow the sequences of each developmental pathway separately in the person-oriented analyses.…”
Section: Group Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, in identity achievement relatively firm commitments are made through a period of exploration, independently of parents or other authorities. Both according to the identity status theory and empirical research, identity achievement is the most mature identity status, while diffusion is the least sophisticated and adaptive status, and identity generally develops toward achievement with age (e.g., Berzonsky & Adams, 1999;Kroger, 2000Kroger, , 2003Marcia, 1993a, 1993b, Schwartz, 2001Waterman, 1999). Identity commitment has been found to be essential for personal well-being (e.g., Berzonsky, 2003;Fadjukoff & Pulkkinen, 2006;Meeus, Iedema, Helsen, &Vollebergh, 1999;Vleioras & Bosma, 2005).…”
Section: Changing Economic Conditions and Identity Formation In Adultmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the few studies was a longitudinal study from early to late middle adulthood by Cramer (2004), who found satisfaction in work, positive interpersonal relationships, and involvement in community, in addition to personality characteristics, predicted progress toward identity achievement in adulthood. Theoretically, environmental contexts of development, in addition to individual characteristics, form the main source of identity formation: Engagement in the identity exploration process is generally more likely to occur in environments that expose the individual to differing points of view, and in which variability of choice is permitted, (e.g., Adams & Marshall, 1996;Berzonsky & Adams, 1999;Bosma & Kunnen, 2001;Erikson, 1968;Grotevant, 1987;Kroger, 2007;Marcia, 2001;Waterman, 1982).…”
Section: Changing Economic Conditions and Identity Formation In Adultmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O'Neil and Adams [32] reported that female university students engage in binge eating to avoid dealing with identity-related issues. Other studies [33,34] found a direct relation between binge eating and a diffuse-avoidant identity style, characterized by avoiding making identity-related decisions [35,36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%