2019
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.23898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reevaluation of the body mass estimate for the KNM‐ER 5428Homo erectustalus

Abstract: Objectives: In this study, we reexamined the body mass estimate for the Homo erectus specimen KNM-ER 5428 based on talus dimensions. Previous estimates of >90 kg for this fossil are large in comparison to body mass estimates for other H. erectus specimens. Materials and methods:The study sample consisted of tali and femora of 132 modern cadaver males from a documented body mass skeletal collection. We recorded the talus trochlear mediolateral (TTML) breadth and femoral head diameter (FHD) for each modern human… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, FACTS and Johns Hopkins University researchers are examining shape and density models to estimate body mass index in unidentified human skeletal remains using the TXSTDSC. The TXSTDSC has also been used to develop regression models for estimating body mass based on the talus and distal humerus for application to paleoanthropology [24,25].…”
Section: Contributions To Biological Profile Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, FACTS and Johns Hopkins University researchers are examining shape and density models to estimate body mass index in unidentified human skeletal remains using the TXSTDSC. The TXSTDSC has also been used to develop regression models for estimating body mass based on the talus and distal humerus for application to paleoanthropology [24,25].…”
Section: Contributions To Biological Profile Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The equations are applicable to other Pleistocene Homo specimens, but not to non-Homo specimens, which have larger diaphyseal cross sections relative to body size than in Homo. 48,83 Other skeletal dimensions, including vertebral body breadths, 11,13,14,16 breadths of the articular surfaces of the tibiotalar (ankle) joint, 11,16,84 and craniofacial dimensions, 85,86 have also been used to estimate body in fossil hominins. However, in all cases, the human reference samples were cadaveric and/or included only a very limited sampling of modern human morphological variation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%