Reexamining racism, sexism, and identity taxation in the academy

Joseph, Tiffany D.; Hirshfield, Laura E.

doi:10.1080/01419870.2022.2143719

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Serving To Transgress1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2023

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article3

Book1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent4

Authors

Journals

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Service is the third responsibility of academics and also our most devalued labor. We are socialized to treat service as a distraction from research, leaving women of color taking on the bulk of it, particularly as related to diversity (Joseph and Hirshfield 2023). Yet, this work is imperative for the success of our students, departments, universities, disciplines, and communities.…”

Section: Serving To Transgressmentioning

confidence: 99%

Transgressing the Academy

Fillingim

Reyes

Rucks-Ahidiana

2023

Sociology of Race and Ethnicity

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Serving To Transgressmentioning

confidence: 99%

Transgressing the Academy

Fillingim

Reyes

Rucks-Ahidiana

2023

Sociology of Race and Ethnicity

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Matilda and Matthew Effects and Sexism in Science

Schmidt

2023

The Invisible Hand of Cancer

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Solidarity Imbalances After Racism and Sexism: Black Americans Are Expected to Express High Solidarity but Anticipate Lower Solidarity From Racial/Ethnic Outgroups

Drake,

Wilkins,

Lai

2024

Social Psychological and Personality Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Because claiming discrimination is not always taken seriously, marginalized groups may consider cues about whom to trust in providing support and solidarity. Black, Hispanic, and Asian participants (Study 1; N = 931) and women (Study 2; N = 1,207) from the United States imagined someone made a discriminatory comment to them and rated the likelihood of being supported by an individual who varied in identity and past solidarity-related behavior. Participants anticipated more support from their own racial/ethnic group for racism and from women for sexism, and then anticipated support by the following groups: Black > Hispanic > Asian ≥ White and women > men. Past behavior boosted anticipated support, especially from outgroups. Strikingly, we found solidarity imbalances; groups consistently anticipated that Black people would support them, yet Black people anticipated lower support from racial/ethnic outgroups.

show abstract

Reexamining racism, sexism, and identity taxation in the academy

Cited by 4 publications

References 11 publications

Transgressing the Academy

Transgressing the Academy

Matilda and Matthew Effects and Sexism in Science

Solidarity Imbalances After Racism and Sexism: Black Americans Are Expected to Express High Solidarity but Anticipate Lower Solidarity From Racial/Ethnic Outgroups

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About