2017 Seventh International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/acii.2017.8273635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refactoring facial expressions: An automatic analysis of natural occurring facial expressions in iterative social dilemma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, results of this study hint towards the contrary; the most frequent facial displays are neutral or have only a single activated AU instead of a combination of AUs. Further research is needed to compare the approach of Stratou et al [40] with the current study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, results of this study hint towards the contrary; the most frequent facial displays are neutral or have only a single activated AU instead of a combination of AUs. Further research is needed to compare the approach of Stratou et al [40] with the current study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…in an emotional environment), the precedence should be given to that particular signal. A recent work by Stratou et al has reduced the AU space by using factors that describe combinations of correlated AU activations [40] ; such approach implies that ECA facial displays can be manipulated with a small number of factors and a change in a specific factor would signify a change in all AUs related to that factor. However, results of this study hint towards the contrary; the most frequent facial displays are neutral or have only a single activated AU instead of a combination of AUs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is likely due to the relatively coarse level of detail that the facial action coding models provide, compared to the fine-scale pixel-level detail in facial texture and shape change offered by the McGM-PCA model. The use of PCA to capture critical dimensions of facial variation from images has previously been employed to describe facial emotions [ 17 , 39 ], but also features such as facial identity [ 23 , 40 , 41 ], gender [ 42 ], and race [ 43 ]. Such approaches typically apply PCA to the original images or after first morphing the faces to a common template to provide a “shape-free” texture representation [ 17 , 41 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies proved that combinations of AUs can account for more variation in behaviour than single AUs alone [27]. In addition, several lines of evidence suggest that the combination of AUs predict behaviour more precisely [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%