2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2007.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Referee analysis of probiotic food supplements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different methods are used for the enumeration of probiotics in the products containing dried probiotic bacteria, including different methods of extraction of bacteria from the products, and as a result the discrepancy in the results obtained in different laboratories, can often be observed (Elahi, Farnell, Thurlow, Scotti, & Varnam, 2008). As an alternative for the most common plate count methods, real time PCR method have already been used for quantification of probiotic bacteria in several studies, however most often in different food, such as fermented milk products, in batch cultures, in faeces or in clinical samples, while studies reporting the application in probiotic food supplements are few (Grattepanche, Lacroix, Audet, & Lapointe, 2005;Matsuki et al 2004;Vitali et al, 2003;Furet, Quénée, & Tailliez, 2004;Sedgley et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different methods are used for the enumeration of probiotics in the products containing dried probiotic bacteria, including different methods of extraction of bacteria from the products, and as a result the discrepancy in the results obtained in different laboratories, can often be observed (Elahi, Farnell, Thurlow, Scotti, & Varnam, 2008). As an alternative for the most common plate count methods, real time PCR method have already been used for quantification of probiotic bacteria in several studies, however most often in different food, such as fermented milk products, in batch cultures, in faeces or in clinical samples, while studies reporting the application in probiotic food supplements are few (Grattepanche, Lacroix, Audet, & Lapointe, 2005;Matsuki et al 2004;Vitali et al, 2003;Furet, Quénée, & Tailliez, 2004;Sedgley et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the presence of multiple and phylogenetically closely related species in these products makes the differential or selective enumeration of probiotic organisms and starter bacteria difficult because of the similarity in growth requirements and overlapping biochemical profiles of the species. Despite the fact that culture-independent molecular tools for the quantification of probiotic organisms in commercial products have recently been developed ( García-Cayuela et al , 2009 ; Matijašiæ et al , 2010 ; Reimann et al , 2010 ; Tabasco et al , 2007 ), food manufacturers still tend to rely on conventional plating techniques for enumeration purposes ( Elahi et al , 2008 ; Fachin et al , 2008 ; Miranda et al , 2011 ; Tharmaraj and Shah, 2003 ; Van de Casteele et al , 2006 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most commonly used bacteria in probiotic additives are Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium. In Lactobacillus, probiotic properties are present only in a restricted number of species (Elahi et al, 2008). Probiotic bacteria like bifidobacteria and lactobacilli are natural inhabitants of the human gut.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%