2009
DOI: 10.1353/jmm.2009.0009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refereed Convention Paper Productivity in the Magazine Division of AEJMC (1999–2008): Analysis of Benchmarks and Impact of Gender

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13 Conversely, another study of refereed convention papers sponsored by the AEJMC Magazine division between 1999 and 2008 revealed a gender gap in top paper productivity and regular refereed paper productivity. 14 Females dominated top convention paper authorship, but males dominated regular refereed paper authorship.…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Conversely, another study of refereed convention papers sponsored by the AEJMC Magazine division between 1999 and 2008 revealed a gender gap in top paper productivity and regular refereed paper productivity. 14 Females dominated top convention paper authorship, but males dominated regular refereed paper authorship.…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some instances, they produced research at per capita rates even higher than their male counterparts. Musambira (2009) refined the research on this topic with an analysis of a specific division, looking at refereed convention papers sponsored by the AEJMC Magazine Division between 1999 and 2008. The author found a gender gap in top paper productivity and regular refereed paper productivity in that division.…”
Section: Scholarshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on AEJMC and diversity may be divided into several key subjects: history of structural diversity in the organization, minority scholars and scholarship, and membership and leadership demographics (Applegate et al, 2011; Barrow, 2004; Musambira, 2009; Ross et al, 2007). Our review of the literature is divided into three streams of knowledge to address these topics: history, scholarship, membership and leadership demographics, which albeit interrelated, merit separate review.…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%