Any non-trivial concurrent system warrants synchronisation, regardless of the concurrency model. Actorbased concurrency serialises all computations in an actor through asynchronous message passing. In contrast, lock-based concurrency serialises some computations by following a lock-unlock protocol for accessing certain data.Both systems require sound reasoning about pointers and aliasing to exclude data-races. If actor isolation is broken, so is the single-thread-of-control abstraction. Similarly for locks, if a datum is accessible outside of the scope of the lock, the datum is not governed by the lock.In this paper we discuss how to balance aliasing and synchronisation. In previous work, we defined a type system that guarantees data-race freedom of actor-based concurrency and lock-based concurrency. This paper extends this work by the introduction of two programming constructs; one for decoupling isolation and synchronisation and one for constructing higher-level atomicity guarantees from lower-level synchronisation. We focus predominantly on actors, and in particular the Encore programming language, but our ultimate goal is to define our constructs in such a way that they can be used both with locks and actors, given that combinations of both models occur frequently in actual systems.We discuss the design space, provide several formalisations of different semantics and discuss their properties, and connect them to case studies showing how our proposed constructs can be useful. We also report on an on-going implementation of our proposed constructs in Encore.In previous work, we designed Kappa [5], a type system in which the boundary of a unit of encapsulation can be statically identified. An entire encapsulated unit can be wrapped inside some synchronisation mechanism, e.g., a lock or an asynchronous actor interface, and consequently all operations inside the boundary are guaranteed to be data-race free. An important goal of this work is facilitating object-oriented reuse in concurrent programming: internal objects are oblivious to how their data-race freedom is guaranteed, and the building blocks can be reused without change regardless of their external synchronisation. Further, making synchronisation tractable simplifies concurrent programming as the portions of a system that are accessed concurrently will be identified, and compilers can verify that the program behaves in accordance with the programmer's intention, with respect to concurrent accesses.This paper explores two extensions to the Kappa system, which we explain in the context of the actor model (although they are equally applicable to a system using locks). The first extension, bestow, allows references to an object to escape its unit of encapsulation without escaping its unit of synchronisation; all external operations on private state will be implicitly delegated to the owner of that state, either via message passing, or by acquiring a lock specific to the owner of the private state. This enables several useful programming patterns without relax...