2017
DOI: 10.1063/1.4977429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reference Correlation for the Viscosity of Carbon Dioxide

Abstract: A comprehensive database of experimental and computed data for the viscosity of carbon dioxide (CO2) was compiled and a new reference correlation was developed. Literature results based on an ab initio potential energy surface were the foundation of the correlation of the viscosity in the limit of zero density in the temperature range from 100 K to 2000 K. Guided symbolic regression was employed to obtain a new functional form that extrapolates correctly to T → 0 K and to 10 000 K. Coordinated measurements at … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
59
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
(276 reference statements)
4
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be observed in Figure 4, the present molecular model is capable to qualitatively and quantitatively predict the variation of both density and viscosity along the studied isobars. The average deviation of the predicted density and shear viscosity from the Span and Wagner equation of state 33 and the Laesecke and Muzny 34 correlation are 3.1% and 3.5%, respectively.
Figure 5Pressure-temperature phase diagram of pure CO 2 together with measured (bullets) and simulated (crosses) state points. The vapor pressure curve (solid line) ends at the critical point (bullet) and is extended by the Widom line connecting the maxima of mobility (inverse kinematic viscosity) 1/ ν (dashed line).
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As can be observed in Figure 4, the present molecular model is capable to qualitatively and quantitatively predict the variation of both density and viscosity along the studied isobars. The average deviation of the predicted density and shear viscosity from the Span and Wagner equation of state 33 and the Laesecke and Muzny 34 correlation are 3.1% and 3.5%, respectively.
Figure 5Pressure-temperature phase diagram of pure CO 2 together with measured (bullets) and simulated (crosses) state points. The vapor pressure curve (solid line) ends at the critical point (bullet) and is extended by the Widom line connecting the maxima of mobility (inverse kinematic viscosity) 1/ ν (dashed line).
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This behavior corresponds to the transition between liquid-like and gas-like states 31 and is mainly caused by the free volume increment associated with density variation.
Figure 4Temperature dependence of density ρ (top) and mobility 1/ ν (bottom) of CO 2 along the isobars p = 9.0 MPa (red), 12.5 MPa (green) and 14.7 MPa (blue). Density from the Span and Wagner equation of state 33 and the shear viscosity from the Laesecke and Muzny 34 correlation (lines) are compared with present simulation results (circles). The statistical uncertainties of the density simulation results are within symbol size.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For CO 2 at room temperature and at a pressure of 6 mbar, the dynamic viscosity and the gas density are η = 1.5 × 10 −5 Pa s (Laesecke and Muzny, 2017) and ρ = 1.12 × 10 −2 kg m −3 , respectively. This finally yields a measured threshold friction velocity for Martian gravity of u * t = 0.72 +0.04 −0.06 m s −1 .…”
Section: Saltation Thresholdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30,62 The viscosity of liquid CO 2 (20°C, 6 MPa) is higher than that of gaseous CO 2 (40°C, 6 MPa). 63 Therefore, it may be more difficult for liquid CO 2 to penetrate small pores and cracks inside the sandstone, allowing for insufficient contact between the mineral components and liquid CO 2 . This reduces the probability of liquid CO 2 combining with water inside the sandstone, which makes the alteration of minerals in sandstone much smaller compared to gaseous CO 2 .…”
Section: Influence Of Co 2 Immersion On Sandstone Mineral Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%