2010
DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reference curves for triceps and subscapular skinfold thicknesses in US children and adolescents

Abstract: The age- and sex-standardized skinfold percentiles and z scores will be appropriate for a wide range of research applications that consider measures of subcutaneous fat. Because they were developed by using the same children as those used for the 2000 BMI curves of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, they provide an important new complementary assessment tool that should be appropriate for almost all US children and adolescents.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

9
136
0
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
9
136
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…A possible explanation for the differences among sexes may be that our data also showed that girls had higher obesity rates than boys (Pp0.001), which is consistent with most studies of preschool children. 35 Our study found that overall, 98.4 and 93.3% of the children met, respectively, the X3 h TPA and X1 h MVPA recommendations. On average, boys were more likely to achieve the recommendations than girls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…A possible explanation for the differences among sexes may be that our data also showed that girls had higher obesity rates than boys (Pp0.001), which is consistent with most studies of preschool children. 35 Our study found that overall, 98.4 and 93.3% of the children met, respectively, the X3 h TPA and X1 h MVPA recommendations. On average, boys were more likely to achieve the recommendations than girls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Figure 7 exemplarily demonstrates how the inclusion of overweight and obese children shifts the percentile values of waist circumference (especially in the higher percentile range) grossly upwards, indicating that the restriction of the sample to normal weight children was a logical decision. There are numerous national anthropometric reference values for WC, 18,[20][21][22][23][24]50 waist-to-height ratio, 51 skinfold thicknesses, 15,16,52 sum of skinfolds, 53 BFM 54,55 and FMI. 7,56 As these data are based on samples including underweight, overweight, as well as obese children, they cannot be directly compared with our results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore in order to delineate the direction of effect, anthropometric and adiposity measurements were compared to published population data. However, the British 1990 growth data is based on measurements collected from 1978-1990 [21] and the American skinfold thickness reference data on measurements from 1963-1994 [25]. Therefore, these data might not be representative of the current population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are no published British reference data for SFT or the derived fat percentage. Therefore, SFT zscores for age and sex were calculated using reference data obtained in the US National Health Examination Surveys and National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) from 1963-1994 [25]. For participants aged over 5 years, fat percentage z-scores for age and sex were calculated using reference data from NHANES 1999-2004 [26].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%