2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2012.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reference Data for Bone Mineral Density in Swedish Women Using Digital X-Ray Radiometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A solution may lie in the emergence of medical imaging-based software applications that opportunistically screen for poor bone health as an incidental finding rather than a referral pathway. 17–22 These approaches use imaging taken for any other reason to identify patients at high risk of osteoporosis without the need for an additional appointment, and with minimal impact on the acquisition and reporting process. However, existing software predominately rely on radiometric measurements of bone properties such as cortical thickness and textural analysis, which relies on the correlation to aBMD rather than measuring the actual biomarker.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A solution may lie in the emergence of medical imaging-based software applications that opportunistically screen for poor bone health as an incidental finding rather than a referral pathway. 17–22 These approaches use imaging taken for any other reason to identify patients at high risk of osteoporosis without the need for an additional appointment, and with minimal impact on the acquisition and reporting process. However, existing software predominately rely on radiometric measurements of bone properties such as cortical thickness and textural analysis, which relies on the correlation to aBMD rather than measuring the actual biomarker.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, existing software predominately rely on radiometric measurements of bone properties such as cortical thickness and textural analysis, which relies on the correlation to aBMD rather than measuring the actual biomarker. 17 , 18 , 20–22 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%