2003
DOI: 10.3233/icg-2003-26204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reference Fallible Endgame Play

Abstract: A reference model of fallible endgame play is defined in terms of a spectrum of endgame players whose play ranges in competence from the optimal to the anti-optimal choice of move. They may be used as suitably skilled practice partners, to assess a player, to differentiate between otherwise equi-optimal moves, to promote or expedite a game result, to run Monte-Carlo simulations, and to identify the difficulty of a position or a whole endgame.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We require that {Re} is a spectrum of players, ranging linearly from the metric-infallible player Roo via the random player Ro to the anti-infallible player R __ To ensure this, the function Se(val, d) is required to meet some natural criteria, as described more fully and formally in Haworth (2003) and in Appendix B.…”
Section: The Reference Endgame Player Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We require that {Re} is a spectrum of players, ranging linearly from the metric-infallible player Roo via the random player Ro to the anti-infallible player R __ To ensure this, the function Se(val, d) is required to meet some natural criteria, as described more fully and formally in Haworth (2003) and in Appendix B.…”
Section: The Reference Endgame Player Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two famous Browne-BELLE KQKR exhibition games have already been studied using the REP model (Haworth, 2003). Browne's apparent competence c was assessed by an Analyser, and BELLE's moves as Black were compared with the decisions of a Predator using the Analyser' s output.…”
Section: Robustness Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations