2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reference free method for real time monitoring of bridge deflections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [31,32], the authors instrumented a railway bridge with QA-750 accelerometers to measure rotations at five locations along the bridge span. Using this [34], they calculated the midspan deflections of the bridge deck. Calculated midspan deflections were later validated with deflections measured with an optical camera system.…”
Section: (4)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [31,32], the authors instrumented a railway bridge with QA-750 accelerometers to measure rotations at five locations along the bridge span. Using this [34], they calculated the midspan deflections of the bridge deck. Calculated midspan deflections were later validated with deflections measured with an optical camera system.…”
Section: (4)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deflection is derived from the method presented by [49], who proposed a procedure to calculate deflection based on accelerometer and strain gauge measurements. The procedure allows for the calculation of deflection using accelerometer readings only if the bridge is instrumented with a sufficient number of inclination sensors.…”
Section: Deflection Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-contact-based measurement approaches use high technology instruments in order to overcome the drawbacks of the conventional deformation sensors. Laser Doppler Vibrometer (LDV) [ 5 , 6 ], Global Positioning System (GPS) [ 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ], laser scanning [ 13 , 14 , 15 ], and image-based measurement methods [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ] are among the most popular non-contact devices. However, all of these methods suffer from drawbacks that limit their application for deformation measurement of bridges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%