2019
DOI: 10.1016/s2213-8587(18)30371-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reference intervals in the diagnosis of thyroid dysfunction: treating patients not numbers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
69
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
2
69
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1,36 Static assumptions in thyroid health may not hold for conditions of glandular stress. 3,38,40 Larger studies are needed to confirm and extend our findings towards a potential future clinical utility of such models, possibly app-based. In healthy subjects, T4-T3 conversion in extra-thyroidal organs is generally accepted as the main T3 source, the thyroidal contribution amounting to approx.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…1,36 Static assumptions in thyroid health may not hold for conditions of glandular stress. 3,38,40 Larger studies are needed to confirm and extend our findings towards a potential future clinical utility of such models, possibly app-based. In healthy subjects, T4-T3 conversion in extra-thyroidal organs is generally accepted as the main T3 source, the thyroidal contribution amounting to approx.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…35 Our findings portray a more flexible view of the hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid regulation, compared to the classical feedback model. 3,[38][39][40] Unlike univariate statistical range considerations for single parameters, set points, as modelled here, are fundamentally more well-founded and may be more suitable for individualised decision-making. This includes the relative importance of various contributions to the circulating T3 pool.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations