2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00799-004-0095-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reference models for digital libraries: actors and roles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The benefits of collaborative online library reference services is an area of considerable debate (Berube, 2004; Borbinha, Kunse, Spinazze, Miutschke, Lieder, Mabe, et al, 2005; Chowdhury, 2002b; Jane & McMillan, 2003; Lankes et al, 2004; Lankes et al, 2003). The OCLC/Library of Congress collaboration, which has capitalized on efforts by hundreds of libraries, is the most analyzed of these services (Gottesman, Kresh, & Takagi, 2004; Penka, 2003).…”
Section: Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The benefits of collaborative online library reference services is an area of considerable debate (Berube, 2004; Borbinha, Kunse, Spinazze, Miutschke, Lieder, Mabe, et al, 2005; Chowdhury, 2002b; Jane & McMillan, 2003; Lankes et al, 2004; Lankes et al, 2003). The OCLC/Library of Congress collaboration, which has capitalized on efforts by hundreds of libraries, is the most analyzed of these services (Gottesman, Kresh, & Takagi, 2004; Penka, 2003).…”
Section: Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many “research agendas” were published as these funded programs came to a close (Larsen & Wactlar, 2003). The DELOS/NSF meetings of 2002–2003 produced a lengthy set of publications in early 2005 that assessed the payoff expected for research in a variety of topical areas (Borbinha et al, 2005; Ioannidis, 2005; Ross & Hedstrom, 2005; Smeaton & Callan, 2005). The tenth anniversary issue of D‐Lib Magazine mixed Whig history with futurology and navel gazing (Arms, 2005; Mischo, 2005; Paepcke, Garcia‐Molina, & Wesley, 2005; Weibel, 2005).…”
Section: Social Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main actors in a digital repository system are producer (information provider), management (professional), and consumer (user) [2,3]. The collaboration among these actors as well as within each class of actors is crucial for ensuring the preservation of and the long-term access to digital records.…”
Section: Interagency and Interprofessional Collaborationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most research in digital libraries so far has taken systemcentric approaches to address how the service will be provided and does not explore in detail the roles of and the relationships between different actors in the digital preservation community [2]. Particularly, the influence of different perspectives and behaviors of these actors on interactions between them in public sector was rarely examined.…”
Section: Interagency and Interprofessional Collaborationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Τα μοντέλα αυτά μπορούν όμως να εστιάζουν σε ειδικότερα τμήματα ενός μεγαλύτερου συνόλου, όπως είναι για παράδειγμα οι ανθρώπινοι φορείς [Borbinha et al, 2003], ούτως ώστε να γίνει κατανοητή η δικτύωση και αλληλεπίδραση των στελεχών αυτών του οργανισμού της ψηφιακής βιβλιοθήκης. Ένα πρόσφατο μοντέλο αναφοράς από το DELOS [Candela et al, 2006], το οποίο δημοσιεύτηκε με τον χαρακτηρισμό «Μανιφέστο», περιλαμβάνει το περιεχόμενο, τον χρήστη, τις λειτουργικότητες, την αρχιτεκτονική, την ποιότητα και την πολιτική ως συνιστώντα μέρη των ψηφιακών βιβλιοθηκών.…”
Section: προτυποποιημένες περιγραφές των ψηφιακών βιβλιοθηκώνunclassified