Reactor Dosimetry 1985
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-5378-9_23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reference Spectrum of d(13)-Be at the INPE Cyclotron

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
15
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
5
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When compared to the large body of experimental results [51], our data are in agreement with most of the experiments performed with monoenergetic sources around 14 MeV as those from Manabe [45], Alknazov [52], Meadows [53], or Garlea [54]. They are also close to those of Jiacoletti et al [55] (up to 5 MeV) and Terayama et al [56] (above 4 MeV), but lower than those of Furman et al around 600 keV [41] and those of Pankratov et al [57] above the second-chance fission threshold and higher than what was reported by Shcherbakov et al [58], Meadows [59], and Behrens et al [60].…”
Section: B Above the Fission Thresholdsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When compared to the large body of experimental results [51], our data are in agreement with most of the experiments performed with monoenergetic sources around 14 MeV as those from Manabe [45], Alknazov [52], Meadows [53], or Garlea [54]. They are also close to those of Jiacoletti et al [55] (up to 5 MeV) and Terayama et al [56] (above 4 MeV), but lower than those of Furman et al around 600 keV [41] and those of Pankratov et al [57] above the second-chance fission threshold and higher than what was reported by Shcherbakov et al [58], Meadows [59], and Behrens et al [60].…”
Section: B Above the Fission Thresholdsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…237 Np from threshold to 1 GeV. n TOF data compared to the ENDF/B-VII.0 and JEFF-3.1 evaluations and to selected experimental data [52,54,55,58,63]. The error bars of the present data correspond to the statistical and systematic uncertainties.…”
Section: B Above the Fission Thresholdmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The reported experimental data of Refs. [76,138,149] were normalized with the IRDFF-II evaluation of the 56 Fe(n, p) 56 Mn reaction, and the change after normalization was 2%, 3%, and 10%, respectively.…”
Section: Qmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, only one study used the characteristic gamma-ray method to determine the daughter nucleus activity [22], and the rest used the annihilation radiation or beta counting method. For the 94 Mo(n,2n) 93m Mo reaction, we found that only ten laboratories [5,6,21,31,[34][35][36][37][38][39] provided neutron-induced cross-section profiles obtained experimentally based on the D -T reaction; meanwhile, four studies reported a single cross-section datum based on a single neutron energy. The energy region at about 14 MeV has been extensively investigated, and 100 Mo(n,2n) 99 Mo data are classified into three bands differing by approximately 30% and 20%, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 92 Mo(n,p) 92m Nb and 96 Mo(n,p) 96 Nb reactions, such divergence between the early experimental data is also substantial. For the 14 MeV energy region, these experimental data are distributed in the intervals of 40~85 mb [6, 7, 12, 14, 21, 22, 34-40, 43, 45, 49, 50, 52, 53, 56] and 10~35 mb [5,6,12,19,21,22,24,31,34,35,37,40,43,45,47,[50][51][52][53][54]62], respectively. With regard to the cross-section data obtained from the nuclear reaction 98 Mo(n,p) 98m Nb, such divergence among the early literature results is more prominent, as seen from the distribution of values in the wide range of 2-20 mb [5, 6, 12, 19, 21, 22, 31, 34, 35, 38-40, 43, 45, 50, 53, 56, 63, 66-68], with the maximum value being nearly ten times the minimum value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%