2021
DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.24495
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reference standards for flow cytometric estimation of absolute nuclear DNA content in plants

Abstract: The estimation of nuclear DNA content has been by far the most popular application of flow cytometry in plants. Because flow cytometry measures relative fluorescence intensities of nuclei stained by a DNA fluorochrome, ploidy determination, and estimation of the nuclear DNA content in absolute units both require comparison to a reference standard of known DNA content. This implies that the quality of the results obtained depends on the standard selection and use. Internal standardization, when the nuclei of an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Classical karyotyping methods using Feulgen staining are challenging in highly polyploid species of Cyperaceae, Juncaceae and Ericaceae due to small size of the chromosomes, which hinders chromosomal determination in polyploids and aneuploids (Chung and Im, 2020;Chung and Chung, 2021;Choi et al, 2022;Redpath et al, 2022). Flow cytometry is an alternative method for estimating genome size and ploidy level (Choi et al, 2021;Sliwinska et al, 2021;Temsch et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classical karyotyping methods using Feulgen staining are challenging in highly polyploid species of Cyperaceae, Juncaceae and Ericaceae due to small size of the chromosomes, which hinders chromosomal determination in polyploids and aneuploids (Chung and Im, 2020;Chung and Chung, 2021;Choi et al, 2022;Redpath et al, 2022). Flow cytometry is an alternative method for estimating genome size and ploidy level (Choi et al, 2021;Sliwinska et al, 2021;Temsch et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We prepared the nuclei extractions of the spore samples and internal standards from the leaf tissues separately because they required different mechanical pre‐treatments (i.e., bead‐vortexing vs. chopping) to acquire nuclei. These separate preparations have been defined as pseudo‐internal standardization (sensu Temsch et al, 2021 ). Nonetheless, the staining properties of the nuclei per se were unlikely to be changed by the different mechanical pre‐treatments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the difficulty of obtaining isolated nuclei of Echeveria and the great differences in the content of nuclei between the Echeveria leaves and the internal standards, it was almost impossible to obtain a good relative proportion of nuclei. Therefore, it was decided to use the pseudo-standardization technique, where the nuclei solutions are prepared separately, check Temsch et al [ 59 ]. Between 120 and 250 mg of Echeveria leaf tissue was chopped with a razor blade in a Petri dish containing 1.5 to 2.00 mL of Otto 1 solution (1.5 mL of 0.1 M citric acid and 0.5% Tween 20), and then filtered through a 50 µm nylon mesh.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Between 120 and 250 mg of Echeveria leaf tissue was chopped with a razor blade in a Petri dish containing 1.5 to 2.00 mL of Otto 1 solution (1.5 mL of 0.1 M citric acid and 0.5% Tween 20), and then filtered through a 50 µm nylon mesh. Separately, 20–42 mg of internal standard plant was chopped into another Petri dish containing 1 mL of Otto1 solution and filtered in the same way [ 59 ]. Both solutions were incubated for 15 min at room temperature.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%